To evaluate which insurance plan might be better for Tyrell, we need to consider his potential medical costs under both plans. Here’s how to analyze the two plans:
Plan A:
- Cost of insurance: $0 (employer pays full cost)
- Doctor's visit copayment: $20 per visit
- Emergency room copayment: $50 per visit
Plan B:
- Monthly cost: $100
- Doctor's visit copayment: $0
- Emergency room copayment: $0
Now let's break down the costs based on Tyrell's expected number of doctor visits and emergency room visits.
-
Determine his number of visits:
- Let's denote the number of doctor visits in a year as \( D \).
- Let's denote the number of emergency room visits in a year as \( E \).
-
Calculate yearly costs for each plan:
Plan A Costs:
- Total cost for visits = \( 20D + 50E \)
Plan B Costs:
- Total yearly insurance cost = \( 100 \times 12 = 1200 \)
- Total cost for visits = \( 0 \) (no copayment)
So, the total cost for Plan B will simply be $1200.
- Set up an inequality to find the breakeven point: To find out when Plan A becomes more expensive than Plan B, we set up the following equation:
\[ 20D + 50E < 1200 \]
- Analyze the scenario: Here, we can plug in different values of \( D \) (doctor visits) and \( E \) (emergency visits) to see how many visits would make Plan A cheaper than Plan B.
For example:
-
If Tyrell has 10 doctor visits and 1 emergency room visit:
- Plan A cost = \( 20(10) + 50(1) = 200 + 50 = 250 \)
- Total cost = 250 (Plan A) < 1200 (Plan B), so Plan A is cheaper.
-
If Tyrell has 20 doctor visits and 2 emergency room visits:
- Plan A cost = \( 20(20) + 50(2) = 400 + 100 = 500 \)
- Total cost = 500 (Plan A) < 1200 (Plan B), still cheaper.
-
If Tyrell has 50 doctor visits and 10 emergency room visits:
- Plan A cost = \( 20(50) + 50(10) = 1000 + 500 = 1500 \)
- Total cost = 1500 (Plan A) > 1200 (Plan B), now Plan B is cheaper.
- Conclusion: From the inequality and examples, Tyrell should choose the plan based on his expected medical usage. If he anticipates high usage (many doctor and ER visits), Plan B may be more economical. If he expects minimal visits, Plan A could be favorable.
To give a personalized recommendation, Tyrell would need to estimate how many visits he expects per year.