(3 points)
In the short term, a conventional farm may be more economically sustainable than an organic farm due to lower initial costs and higher yields. Conventional farming practices often require less labor and resources, leading to lower production costs and higher profits. Additionally, conventional farms may benefit from government subsidies and insurance programs that are not typically available to organic farmers.
However, in the long term, organic farming is generally more economically and environmentally sustainable. Organic farming practices prioritize soil health, biodiversity, and sustainability, leading to healthier ecosystems and soil that can support crops for years to come. Organic farms also tend to have lower input costs over time as they rely on natural methods of pest control and fertilization, reducing the need for expensive chemicals and synthetic fertilizers.
Overall, organic farming is more likely to be economically and environmentally sustainable in the long term due to its focus on sustainable practices and soil health.
Two types of farming are conventional and organic. On a conventional farm, irrigation and chemical fertilizer may be used on fields that contain rows of only one type of crop. On an organic farm, multiple crops may be grown in one field. Pests may be removed by hand, and soil may be amended with fertilizer made from ground fish or animal manure,
How could a conventional farm be more economically sustainable than an organic farm?
Part A
(3 points)
Which type of farm is more economically and environmentally sustainable in the long term? Explain your answer.
Part B
1 answer