Two groups of scientists got different results while studying about the origin of the universe. Which of these statements is most likely true about the results of the two groups of scientists?

They were not repeated and verified.

They provide new testable ideas to strengthen science.

They show that the ideas of both groups of scientists are invalid.

They prove that it is impossible for all scientists to accept the same theory.

i really need help with this pls help

1 answer

If the results are conflicting I would pick A

If the results are from different branches of the same study area I would pick B
Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  1. What triggered the cyclic model of the origin of the universe?A: some scientists think that the universe will not keep expanding
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. What triggered the cyclic model of the origin of the universe? (1 point)• Some scientists began to use telescopes and
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. What triggered the cyclic model of the origin of the universesome scientists began to use telescopes and mathematics to study
    1. answers icon 3 answers
more similar questions