Two competing (modern) theories about nuclear weapons and how to ensure global peace%0D%0ATheory 1: All nuclear weapons are too many!%0D%0AMany theorists think that the more countries that have nuclear weapons, the higher the level of global danger and potential catastrophe. %0D%0AThis catastrophe could be caused deliberately, such as through a war, or accidentally, such as by a nuclear explosion happening accidentally

Question

Theory 2: Mutually Assured Destruction keeps us safe!
Some theorists think the opposite from theory 1. They argue that the more countries that have nuclear weapons, the safer we all are as the threat of mutually assured destruction is enough to keep everything peaceful.
What is your opinion? What theory do you think is best when it comes to nuclear weapons and ensuring global peace? (The only "wrong" answer is "idk". Pick one of the theories and explain your reasons)

Answer 1

I believe that Theory 1, that all nuclear weapons are too many, is the best approach to ensuring global peace. The potential catastrophic consequences of nuclear weapons are simply too great to ignore. The more countries that possess these weapons, the higher the risk of them being used either intentionally or accidentally. Additionally, the proliferation of nuclear weapons can lead to an arms race and increased tensions between nations.

On the other hand, relying on Mutually Assured Destruction, as Theory 2 suggests, is a dangerous game to play. It essentially hinges on the threat of using nuclear weapons as a deterrent, which can easily spiral out of control and result in a catastrophic outcome for all involved. The notion that the fear of mutual destruction will keep the peace is risky and not a sustainable solution in the long run.

Ultimately, the best way to ensure global peace is through disarmament and non-proliferation efforts. By reducing the number of nuclear weapons in the world and preventing more countries from acquiring them, we can significantly decrease the risks associated with these weapons and work towards a more peaceful and secure world.

Answer 2

in simpler terms?

Answer 3

In simpler terms, I believe that having fewer nuclear weapons in the world is the best way to keep everyone safe. The more countries that have these weapons, the more likely they might be used either on purpose or by mistake. Relying on the threat of mutual destruction to prevent war is too risky and could lead to a disastrous outcome. By reducing the number of nuclear weapons and stopping more countries from getting them, we can create a safer and more peaceful world for everyone.