Triangle FGH is similar to triangle IJK. Find the measure of side KI. Figures are not drawn to scale.

F
G
H
I
J
K
8
32
4.7
Answer
Attempt 1 out of 2

5 answers

To find the measure of side \( KI \) in triangle \( IJK \), you can use the property of similar triangles, which states that the corresponding sides of similar triangles are proportional.

Given the information:

  • The length of side \( FG \) corresponds to side \( IJ \).
  • The length of side \( GH \) corresponds to side \( JK \).
  • The length of side \( FH \) corresponds to side \( IK \).

From your question, though, you’ve provided lengths for the sides:

  • \( FG = 8 \)
  • \( GH = 32 \)
  • \( FH = 4.7 \)

We don't have the actual lengths of \( IJ \), \( JK \), or \( IK \), but we can set up a proportion using the given lengths.

Assuming \( FG \) is the side corresponding to \( IJ \), then the proportion between the two triangles can be set up as follows:

\[ \frac{FG}{IJ} = \frac{GH}{JK} = \frac{FH}{IK} \]

Using arbitrary variables since we don’t have specific lengths for the triangle \( IJK \):

  • Let \( IJ = x \)
  • Let \( JK = y \)
  • Let \( IK = z \)

Establishing the ratios using the known sides:

From side \( FG \) to side \( IJ \): \[ \frac{8}{x} \]

From side \( GH \) to side \( JK \): \[ \frac{32}{y} \]

From side \( FH \) to side \( IK \): \[ \frac{4.7}{z} \]

For these triangles to be similar: \[ \frac{8}{x} = \frac{32}{y} = \frac{4.7}{z} \]

To find \( KI \) (which is \( z \)), we need additional information like the corresponding sides or a scale factor. Without that, we cannot determine the exact value of \( KI \).

If you have specific values for sides \( IJ \) or \( JK \) given, we can proceed with those values. Please provide those, or a specific scale factor between the triangles if available!

jk is 32

Great! Now that we know that \(JK = 32\), we can use the side lengths of triangles \(FGH\) and \(IJK\) to find \(KI\).

Since triangle \(FGH\) is similar to triangle \(IJK\), the sides are proportional. Here's the proportion we can set up using the sides we have:

Given:

  • \(FG = 8\) (corresponds to \(IJ\))
  • \(GH = 32\) (corresponds to \(JK\))
  • \(FH = 4.7\) (corresponds to \(IK\))
  • \(JK = 32\)

Using the ratio of corresponding sides:

\[ \frac{FG}{IJ} = \frac{GH}{JK} = \frac{FH}{IK} \]

Substituting the known values, we set up the following proportion:

Using \(GH\) and \(JK\):

\[ \frac{8}{IJ} = \frac{32}{32} \]

This simplifies to:

\[ \frac{8}{IJ} = 1 \]

This implies:

\[ IJ = 8 \]

Now, we need to find \(IK\).

Using \(FH\) and \(IK\), we can set up the proportion:

\[ \frac{8}{8} = \frac{4.7}{IK} \]

Since \(\frac{8}{8} = 1\):

\[ 1 = \frac{4.7}{IK} \]

Thus, we can solve for \(IK\):

\[ IK = 4.7 \]

Now we can conclude that: The measure of side \(KI\) is \(4.7\).

4.7 is wrong is there possible another answer

Let’s walk through the calculations once more using the proportion of similar triangles to find the correct value for \( KI \).

Given Values

  • \( FG = 8 \)
  • \( GH = 32 \)
  • \( JK = 32 \)

Using the property of similar triangles, we know:

\[ \frac{FG}{IJ} = \frac{GH}{JK} = \frac{FH}{IK} \]

We now know that since \( JK = 32 \) and \( GH = 32 \), we can infer that \( \frac{GH}{JK} = \frac{32}{32} = 1 \).

Finding the Proportions

  1. Set up the proportion using \( FG \) and \( IJ \):

    • \(\frac{8}{IJ} = 1\)
    • This implies \( IJ = 8 \).
  2. Since \( JK = 32 \) and corresponds to \( GH = 32 \), we confirm the ratios thus far are consistent.

  3. Now let’s check the last side \( FH \):

    • We have the proportions:

\[ \frac{FG}{IJ} = \frac{FH}{IK} \]

Substituting what we have:

\[ \frac{8}{8} = \frac{4.7}{KI} \]

This simplifies to:

\[ 1 = \frac{4.7}{KI} \]

From this, we solve for \( KI \):

\[ KI = 4.7 \]

Re-checking Other Possible Answers

Let’s check if there’s any other possible relationship.

Since we know \( JK = 32 \) corresponds to \( GH = 32 \), we can calculate the side based on a different approach. When using the relationship of the sides, we can set:

\[ \frac{FG}{IJ} = \frac{FH}{IK} \]

If we denote:

  • \( FK = x \) (the missing side),
  • \( FH = 4.7 \)

Using the established proportion:

We can find that:

\[ \frac{8}{8} = \frac{4.7}{KI} \]

This indicates the following:

Since all due calculations bring us back to \( KI \) as \( 4.7 \), it implies there might have been an additional misunderstanding or difference in sides.

Conclusion

The calculations consistently show that the computed measure of side \( KI \) is \( 4.7 \). If a different answer is needed, we should re-check which lengths correspond and if we have understood their relationships correctly or if there is any indication of alternative side lengths. If you have additional values or relationships, please share, and we can clarify further!