Question
Trapezoid ABCD coordinates: A(3,1), B(7,1) C(6,4)D(4,4)
Trapezoid A'B'C'D' coordinates: A'(-1,3) B'(-1,7) C'(-4,6) D'(-4,4)
Which explanation for the congruency of the trapezoids is correct?
Statement #1: The trapezoids are congruent because ABCD was reflected over the line y=z
Statement #2: The trapezoids are congruent because ABCD was translated left 4 units and up 2 units
Statement #3: The trapezoids are congruent because ABCD was rotated 270 degrees (counterclockwise)
Statement #4: The trapezoids are congruent because ABCD was rotated 90 degrees (counterclockwise)
Which statement is correct?
Trapezoid A'B'C'D' coordinates: A'(-1,3) B'(-1,7) C'(-4,6) D'(-4,4)
Which explanation for the congruency of the trapezoids is correct?
Statement #1: The trapezoids are congruent because ABCD was reflected over the line y=z
Statement #2: The trapezoids are congruent because ABCD was translated left 4 units and up 2 units
Statement #3: The trapezoids are congruent because ABCD was rotated 270 degrees (counterclockwise)
Statement #4: The trapezoids are congruent because ABCD was rotated 90 degrees (counterclockwise)
Which statement is correct?
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which statement is correct about the congruency of trapezoids ABCD and A'B'C'D', let's analyze the coordinates:
- Trapezoid ABCD:
- A(3, 1)
- B(7, 1)
- C(6, 4)
- D(4, 4)
- Trapezoid A'B'C'D':
- A'(-1, 3)
- B'(-1, 7)
- C'(-4, 6)
- D'(-4, 4)
To compare the coordinates, let's test each statement to see if they correctly describe a transformation that leads from ABCD to A'B'C'D'.
**Statement #1:** **Reflection over the line y = z.**
When reflecting a point (x, y) over the line y = x, the new coordinates become (y, x). Applying this transformation:
- A(3, 1) becomes (1, 3)
- B(7, 1) becomes (1, 7)
- C(6, 4) becomes (4, 6)
- D(4, 4) becomes (4, 4)
This does not match A', B', C', and D'.
**Statement #2:** **Translation left 4 units and up 2 units.**
Translating points by subtracting 4 from the x-coordinate and adding 2 to the y-coordinate:
- A(3, 1) => A'(-1, 3)
- B(7, 1) => B'(-1, 7)
- C(6, 4) => C'(-4, 6)
- D(4, 4) => D'(-4, 4)
This matches all the points exactly. This statement seems to be correct.
**Statement #3:** **Rotation 270 degrees (counterclockwise).**
Rotating 270 degrees (or 90 degrees clockwise) would not yield the same points as A'B'C'D'.
**Statement #4:** **Rotation 90 degrees (counterclockwise).**
When rotating a point (x, y) 90 degrees counterclockwise, the new coordinates become (-y, x).
Applying to ABCD:
- A(3, 1) becomes (-1, 3)
- B(7, 1) becomes (-1, 7)
- C(6, 4) becomes (-4, 6)
- D(4, 4) becomes (-4, 4)
This matches A', B', C', D'.
Therefore, both **Statement #2 (translation left 4 units and up 2 units)** and **Statement #4 (rotation 90 degrees counterclockwise)** correctly describe transformations that result in congruent trapezoids.
However, **Statement #2** clearly is a simpler and more straightforward way to reach from ABCD to A'B'C'D', as it involves a direct translation rather than a rotation.
So the correct conclusion is that **Statement #2** is one correct explanation for the congruency of the trapezoids.
- Trapezoid ABCD:
- A(3, 1)
- B(7, 1)
- C(6, 4)
- D(4, 4)
- Trapezoid A'B'C'D':
- A'(-1, 3)
- B'(-1, 7)
- C'(-4, 6)
- D'(-4, 4)
To compare the coordinates, let's test each statement to see if they correctly describe a transformation that leads from ABCD to A'B'C'D'.
**Statement #1:** **Reflection over the line y = z.**
When reflecting a point (x, y) over the line y = x, the new coordinates become (y, x). Applying this transformation:
- A(3, 1) becomes (1, 3)
- B(7, 1) becomes (1, 7)
- C(6, 4) becomes (4, 6)
- D(4, 4) becomes (4, 4)
This does not match A', B', C', and D'.
**Statement #2:** **Translation left 4 units and up 2 units.**
Translating points by subtracting 4 from the x-coordinate and adding 2 to the y-coordinate:
- A(3, 1) => A'(-1, 3)
- B(7, 1) => B'(-1, 7)
- C(6, 4) => C'(-4, 6)
- D(4, 4) => D'(-4, 4)
This matches all the points exactly. This statement seems to be correct.
**Statement #3:** **Rotation 270 degrees (counterclockwise).**
Rotating 270 degrees (or 90 degrees clockwise) would not yield the same points as A'B'C'D'.
**Statement #4:** **Rotation 90 degrees (counterclockwise).**
When rotating a point (x, y) 90 degrees counterclockwise, the new coordinates become (-y, x).
Applying to ABCD:
- A(3, 1) becomes (-1, 3)
- B(7, 1) becomes (-1, 7)
- C(6, 4) becomes (-4, 6)
- D(4, 4) becomes (-4, 4)
This matches A', B', C', D'.
Therefore, both **Statement #2 (translation left 4 units and up 2 units)** and **Statement #4 (rotation 90 degrees counterclockwise)** correctly describe transformations that result in congruent trapezoids.
However, **Statement #2** clearly is a simpler and more straightforward way to reach from ABCD to A'B'C'D', as it involves a direct translation rather than a rotation.
So the correct conclusion is that **Statement #2** is one correct explanation for the congruency of the trapezoids.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.