It seems like you are providing a structured breakdown or analysis of how to represent a zebra using specific classifiers (CL) in sign language or a similar modality. Here's a consolidated interpretation of the elements you've mentioned, along with explanation:
-
Zebra Representation:
- The term "fs-ZEBRA" indicates fingerspelling for the word "zebra," which is often used when no sign exists or for clarity in communication.
-
Comparison with Horse:
- "APPEAR SAME-AS HORSE" engages classifiers that show physical attributes:
- CL: 2: This classifier can be used to depict the legs of a horse and zebra in a standing position.
- CL: B: This classifier indicates height and eye gaze, useful for showing the general stature of both animals.
- "APPEAR SAME-AS HORSE" engages classifiers that show physical attributes:
-
Stripes and Coloration:
- Representing the zebra’s stripes:
- CL: 4: This is likely used to show multiple stripes on the zebra's body.
- CL: G (dom. individual stripes, BLACK non-dom): Primary classifier indicates dominant black stripes.
- CL: G (dom individual stripes, WHITE non-dom): This would indicate the white stripes, with a non-dominant role.
- CL: 4: This is likely used to show multiple stripes on the zebra's body.
- Representing the zebra’s stripes:
-
Facial Features:
- Face: For the shape of the zebra's face, you use CL: claw, which might describe the general outline or shape of the face.
-
Ears Representation:
- Ear: Using CL: U indicates the ears of the zebra being upright, which can communicate alertness or attention.
-
Mane Description:
- Hair: The mane of the zebra can be depicted with CL: 4, which likely references a mohawk style, pointing out a unique characteristic of the zebra’s mane.
Overall, the structure you provided outlines a systematic approach to sign language representation of the zebra's features while comparing them, primarily, to those of a horse. Each classifier conveys specific attributes and helps visualize or communicate the characteristics of the zebra effectively.