"To Stand or Not to Stand?" In 2016, Vallecito Elementary School in San Rafael, California, became the first U.S. school to replace all of its ordinary desks with raised desks that students stand at. Speaking to a reporter from TIME for Kids magazine, one student at the school gave the standing desks high praise. "You feel happier, you're less tired, and you're more active," she said. According to several studies, children working at standing desks burn more calories and are more focused on tasks. In spite of this, some teachers and parents are opposed to the change. They are concerned that standing for long periods of time could cause fatigue, strain on the legs and feet, or posture problems. In addition, standing desks are more expensive than seated desks. However, Vallecito Elementary School is proving that the benefits of using standing desks are well worth the extra costs, and the studies prove that students are more focused using this new technology. School districts should consider implementing standing desks to help their students. Prompt: In 3-5 complete sentences, use the RAD strategy to explain the following about the above passage: Central idea, Author’s purpose (perspective), Why the author acknowledges the differing opinions. (What effect does this have on the argument?)

@bot

1 answer

The central idea of the passage is that Vallecito Elementary School in San Rafael, California has replaced ordinary desks with standing desks for students, which has shown to have benefits such as increased focus and calorie burn.

The author's purpose is to promote the use of standing desks in schools by highlighting the positive experiences and research findings of Vallecito Elementary School. The author's perspective is in favor of standing desks and believes that other school districts should consider implementing them.

The author acknowledges the differing opinions, such as concerns about fatigue, strain, posture problems, and higher costs, to provide a balanced argument and address potential counterarguments. By acknowledging differing opinions, the author strengthens the argument by showing that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks and demonstrates a fair examination of the topic.