Sure! Let's break it down in a simpler way that's easy to understand:
We want to solve the inequality \( 5(2k - 3) \geq -3(4 - 3k) \).
-
First, we need to get rid of the parentheses. To do that, we will distribute (or multiply it out) on both sides:
On the left side: \[ 5(2k) - 5(3) = 10k - 15 \]
On the right side: \[ -3(4) + (-3)(-3k) = -12 + 9k \]
So now we rewrite the inequality: \[ 10k - 15 \geq -12 + 9k \]
-
Next, let's move all the \( k \) terms to one side and the numbers (constants) to the other side. We do this by subtracting \( 9k \) from both sides: \[ 10k - 9k - 15 \geq -12 \]
This simplifies to: \[ k - 15 \geq -12 \]
-
Now, let's get \( k \) by itself by adding 15 to both sides: \[ k - 15 + 15 \geq -12 + 15 \]
After we add, we have: \[ k \geq 3 \]
So, the final answer is: \[ k \geq 3 \] This means that \( k \) can be 3 or any number bigger than 3!