This is a map illustrating the Missouri Compromise of 1820.

In 4-5 sentences (and in your own words), explain what piece of legislation this map represents, what the legislation in question was meant to do, important people that were involved, states that were involved, & if this legislation was effective in trying to solve the problems that it was meant to.

If you have less than a 4-5 sentence response, it is too short!

• Restate the question in your opening sentence IN YOUR OWN WORDS.

Answer by explaining what the piece of legislation was....

• Cite/provide examples of who was involved in creating it, & the states that were involved (no notes/book/internet)

Explain how this legislation was either effective or ineffective in addressing the issue it was trying to solve...

Summarize by restating your main idea from your topic sentence, & include details from your supporting sentences.

Make it look like a 8th grader wrote it

Make sure no one can find this

1 answer

This map shows the Missouri Compromise of 1820, a significant piece of legislation aimed at addressing the growing tensions between free and slave states in the United States. The compromise was mainly orchestrated by key figures such as Henry Clay, who is often called the "Great Compromiser." It involved Missouri, which wanted to join the Union as a slave state, and Maine, which entered as a free state, to keep the balance of power. The legislation drew a line at 36°30' latitude, which established where slavery would be allowed and where it would be prohibited in future states. While the Missouri Compromise temporarily eased tensions and maintained a fragile balance, it ultimately proved ineffective in resolving the deep-rooted issues surrounding slavery, as divisions continued to grow leading up to the Civil War. In summary, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt to solve the slavery issue by balancing free and slave states but only postponed the inevitable conflict.