To determine which two statements about the student's journey are true, we need to analyze the graph based on the possible movement patterns and breaks.
-
The student stopped for at least one rest break.
- True: If there's a flat line on the graph, it indicates the student was not moving, which means he stopped for a rest.
-
The student rode faster at the end of his ride than at the beginning.
- Depends on the graph: If the slope of the graph is steeper at the end compared to the beginning, this could be true, but without seeing the graph, we can't confirm.
-
The student rode faster at the beginning, rested, then rode at a slower pace, rested, and then rode at a faster pace.
- Depends on the graph: This could be true if there are segments showing these actions, but again, without the graph, we can't confirm.
-
The student rode slower, then a bit faster, then rested at the ice cream shop.
- Depends on the graph: If the graph shows initial slow movement, followed by a faster pace, then a rest at the end, this would be true.
-
The student spent more time resting than riding his bike.
- Depends on the graph: If the rest periods account for a longer duration than the riding segments, then this would be true.
Assuming common patterns of a student biking to an ice cream shop, we might suggest that the first statement about having at least one rest break and possibly a statement about riding slower initially (and possibly resting) could be common observations. However, without the visual information from the graph, the definitive true statements cannot be ascertained.
Based on general estimation, a safe selection would be:
- The student stopped for at least one rest break.
- The student rode slower, then a bit faster, then rested at the ice cream shop.
These statements are plausible with typical biking journeys where a student would take breaks particularly at a destination like an ice cream shop.
3 answers