To determine which statements are true about the student's journey based on the graph you mentioned, I'd need to analyze the key features of the graph typically associated with such a scenario (like distance vs. time).
Since I don't have the actual graph, I can provide general guidance on evaluating each of the statements:
-
The student rode slower, then a bit faster, then rested at the ice cream shop.
- If the graph shows a decrease in the slope (indicating a slower pace), followed by an increase (indicating a faster pace), and then a plateau (indicating rest), this statement would be true.
-
The student rode faster at the end of his ride than at the beginning.
- If the slope (indicating speed) towards the end of the graph is steeper than at the beginning, this statement is true.
-
The student spent more time resting than riding his bike.
- This would be true if the time spent on a flat line (resting) exceeds the time represented by the slopes (riding).
-
The student stopped for at least one rest break.
- This statement is true if there is at least one flat segment (rest) in the graph.
-
The student rode faster at the beginning, rested, then at a slower pace, rested, and then at a little faster pace.
- This would be true if the graph's initial slope is steep, followed by a flat line, a shallower slope (indicating slower riding), another flat line, and then another increase in slope.
If you describe the specific features of the graph, I can help you determine which statements are true based on that information.
1 answer