The 1865 account of a tragic event, such as the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, would have had a significant impact on readers of that time due to the unique style and tone of reporting during that era. As citizens may have read the report several days after the incident occurred, it would have allowed for a more reflective and thoughtful approach to news delivery. However, the introduction of the 24-hour news cycle today has drastically changed the way tragic events are reported, which in turn affects the way citizens respond to such news.
In 1865, journalism was characterized by a more formal and literary style. Reporters employed a narrative approach that focused on detailed descriptions and emotional language. For example, the report may have described the events leading up to the assassination, the reactions of witnesses, and the atmosphere of grief and shock that permeated the scene. Such a report aimed to convey the gravity of the situation and evoke a deep emotional response from readers. Given the slower pace of news delivery at that time, readers had more time to digest the news and reflect upon its significance, leading to a more profound impact on public sentiment.
However, the advent of the 24-hour news cycle and digital media has revolutionized the way news is reported today. News outlets constantly strive to be the first to report breaking news, leading to a more fast-paced and often fragmented approach to tragic events. Instead of reflective storytelling, news today tends to focus on providing quick, concise updates and visuals, with a greater emphasis on sensationalism and viewer engagement. This rapid and sensational reporting can sometimes result in misinformation or a lack of context, leading to a more immediate and intense, but often fleeting, emotional response.
The changes brought about by the 24-hour news cycle can alter the way citizens respond to tragedy today. With information available instantaneously, individuals often find themselves bombarded with harrowing images and distressing news alerts. This constant exposure to tragedy can desensitize people to some extent, leading to shorter attention spans and emotional exhaustion. Moreover, the need for constant updates and fresh content can sometimes prioritize sensationalism over thorough and accurate reporting, further distorting the public's perception of a tragedy.
Furthermore, the rapid news cycle can also result in an oversaturation of tragic events, making it challenging for individuals to single out and engage with each incident. As a result, citizens may develop a sense of helplessness or numbness, causing them to disengage or become desensitized to the suffering of others. This can hinder the collective response to tragedy, as a lack of sustained attention and action can impede efforts to address the root causes or provide meaningful support to the affected communities.
In conclusion, the 1865 account of a tragic event would have impacted readers of the time due to its reflective and emotional style, allowing for a deeper resonance with the news. However, today's 24-hour news cycle has transformed the way such events are reported, leading to more rapid and fragmented coverage. This change can alter the way citizens respond to tragedy, often resulting in shorter attention spans, emotional exhaustion, and an oversaturation of tragic events. These shifts in reporting can hinder the public's ability to fully engage with and adequately respond to tragedy, potentially reducing the collective support and action taken in its aftermath.
This 1865 account has a certain style and tone that differs from news stories today. What effect do you think such a report had on readers in 1865? Keep in mind that citizens might have read the report several days after the event occurred. How would today’s 24-hour news cycle affect reporting on such a tragic event? How might those changes alter the way citizens today respond to tragedy? Give your opinion and support it with examples.
Post a detailed response to the 1865 Reporting Discussion prompt.
1 answer