These ferns may be the first plants known to work together as ants do

Jake Buehler

2021
Font Size

Medium

In this article, the author discusses a discovery made by Kevin Burns about staghorn ferns. Kevin Burns is a biologist, meaning that he studies living things.
A mass of strange ferns embraces a trunk high among the treetops. They look like a giant tangle of floppy, green antlers. Below their fork-shaped fronds and closer into the core of this lush knot of greenery are brown, disc-shaped plants. These, too, are ferns. They are even the same species. Together these individuals form a society, a type of society that has only ever been observed in animals, especially bees, termites, and ants. Staghorn ferns — and possibly other plants — appear to work together, each taking on different tasks that together aid their society.

Kevin Burns is a biologist at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand. He first became familiar with the ferns while working on Lord Howe, an isolated island between Australia and New Zealand. He took notes on local island epiphytes (EP-ih-fytes) — plants that grow on other plants — and one species caught his eye: the staghorn fern. The staghorn fern (Platycerium bifurcatum) is native to parts of mainland Australia and Indonesia, too.

“I realized,” Burns recalls, these ferns “never occur alone.” Some of the larger clusters were massive. They contained hundreds of individuals, and Burns soon realized “each one of those individuals was doing a different thing.”

He likens the fern colonies to an upside-down umbrella. Some with long, green, waxy “strap” fronds appeared to direct rainwater to the center of the clump. There, spongey, disc-shaped, brown “nest” fronds absorbed this moisture.

The whole community reminded Burns of a termite mound, which houses a shared store of resources. Inside it, various members of the termite colony perform different tasks.

Scientists call such cooperative groups eusocial (Yu-SOH-shul). Overlapping generations live together in castes,1 with each performing different roles. Among eusocial animals, some workers might be responsible for finding food, while others might be nurses or caregivers.

Eusocial has been used to describe certain societies of insects and crustaceans, along with two species of mole rats. Burns wondered if ferns, too, might be eusocial.

His team’s data now indicate they are. These ferns appear to form a complex society made up of interdependent groups.

Truly eusocial? Let me count the ways
Ferns reproduce via spores, which form on the underside of leaf-like fronds. Some four in every 10 fronds of the studied communities of staghorn ferns could not reproduce and mostly served as nests for others. However, another fern with strap fronds could develop fertile spores. This suggests a division of labor between fronds that do and don’t form nests.

Tests also revealed that nest fronds sop up more water than strap fronds do. Earlier studies conducted by other scientists had found networks of roots running throughout the colony. Using them, nest fronds can share their water, slaking the thirst of neighboring strap fronds.

Burns and his coworkers also analyzed the genes in 10 staghorn colonies on Lord Howe Island. Eight hosted genetically identical individuals, while only two colonies contained individuals whose genetics differed. Such a high degree of genetic relatedness is seen in colonies of eusocial insects. In ants and bees, for instance, many sisters contribute to the survival of their home nest.

Burns thinks the staghorns’ newfound traits fulfill many of the requirements needed to support a claim that they, too, are eusocial.

Looking at epiphytes as eusocial is “really cool,” says Michelle Spicer, an ecologist at the University of Puget Sound in Washington.

To Burns, the division of labor to build shared resources “appears to be a key feature that sets staghorn [ferns] apart from other colonial plants.” A stressful life in the treetops — far from the soil — may have helped the ferns develop eusocial traits, Burns says. The society these plants create allows all members to share scarce supplies of water and nutrients. Spicer points out, however, that a sharing of water and nutrients also occurs among other epiphytes.

The new study makes a compelling case that staghorn ferns are eusocial, says Brian Whyte. “The epiphyte lifestyle certainly facilitates2 group living,” he adds. “And group living is where all social stories start.” Whyte is a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley.

Whyte is fascinated by how staghorns form colonies in the wild, where members perform different, individual tasks. However, he notes, when grown in soil as ornamental plants, these ferns don’t need a community. They now form individual strap fronds. Such variability is not typical of eusocial species, he says.

Burns says he’s really excited to have found something in the wild that unexpectedly turns out to be “comparable to some of the coolest, most advanced societies in the living world.” And regardless of how eusocial these ferns are, they still have intriguing similarities and differences from caste-forming animals, he adds.

How does the author develop his claim that staghorn ferns are most likely eusocial?

A. by discussing plants other than staghorn ferns that are eusocial

B. by describing how certain traits of eusocial organisms apply to staghorn ferns

C. by explaining how staghorn ferns have changed over time to become eusocial

D. by suggesting that most plants are eusocial

11 answers

The correct answer is B. by describing how certain traits of eusocial organisms apply to staghorn ferns.

The author discusses specific characteristics and behaviors of staghorn ferns that align with the definition of eusociality, such as division of labor, genetic relatedness, and cooperative water sharing, thereby building a case for their eusociality.

What is the meaning of "variability" in paragraph 16?

A. changeability

B. competition

C. efficiency

D. reliability

The meaning of "variability" in paragraph 16 is A. changeability.

In the context of the paragraph, it refers to the differences in how the staghorn ferns behave when grown in soil versus in their natural environment, highlighting the potential for change in their structure and function based on different growing conditions.

Which of the following best identifies the author's main purpose in the article?

A. to discuss the various plant and animal species that are eusocial

B. to share findings that support the idea that staghorn ferns are eusocial

C. to challenge claims that reject the idea that staghorn ferns are eusocial

D. to encourage scientists to study other plant species that might be eusocial

The best answer that identifies the author's main purpose in the article is B. to share findings that support the idea that staghorn ferns are eusocial.

The article focuses on presenting the research and observations made by Kevin Burns and his team, which suggest that staghorn ferns exhibit eusocial traits, thereby supporting the idea of their eusociality.

Which TWO statements best describe the central ideas of the article?

A. Magpies will randomly swoop people to assert their dominance.

B. Magpies will swoop people to warn them away from their nests.

C. Magpies that trust people can form long-lasting friendships with them.

D. People can establish a friendship with magpies by offering them food.

E. People are more likely to form a friendship with magpies kept as pets.

F. People should show that they are unafraid when swooped by magpies.

The two statements that best describe the central ideas of the article are:

C. Magpies that trust people can form long-lasting friendships with them.

D. People can establish a friendship with magpies by offering them food.

These statements highlight the relationship between magpies and people, focusing on trust and friendship developed through specific behaviors.

The author introduces magpies by —

A. explaining how different species of animals defend themselves.

B. defining important terms that the reader will need to understand.

C. presenting the question she plans to answer throughout the article.

D. discussing birds and then broadening her discussion to other animal species.

The correct answer is C. presenting the question she plans to answer throughout the article.

The author typically introduces a topic by posing a question or establishing a focus that guides the discussion, particularly regarding magpies and their behavior in relation to humans.

Magpies can form friendships with people – here's how
Gisela Kaplan

2017
Font Size

Medium

In this article, Gisela Kaplan discusses the relationship between humans and magpies, a type of black and white bird.
Can one form a friendship with a magpie — even when adult males are protecting their nests during the swooping season? The short answer is: “Yes, one can.”

Ravens and magpies are known to form powerful allegiances among themselves. In fact, Australia is thought to be a hotspot for cooperative behavior in birds worldwide. They like to stick together with family and mates.

Of course, many bird species may readily become tame enough to take food from our hand, but this isn’t really “friendship.” However, there is evidence that, remarkably, free-living magpies can forge lasting relationships with people, even without depending on us for food or shelter.

When magpies are permanently settled on human property, they are also far less likely to swoop the people who live there. Over 80% of all successfully breeding magpies live near human houses, which means the vast majority of people never get swooped. Also, since magpies can live between 25 and 30 years and are territorial, they can develop lifelong friendships with humans. This bond can extend to trusting certain people around their offspring.

A key reason why friendships with magpies are possible is that we now know that magpies are able to recognize and remember individual human faces for many years. They will remember someone who was good to them; equally, they remember negative encounters.

Why become friends?
Magpies that actively form friendships with people make this investment (from their point of view) for good reason. Properties suitable for magpies are hard to come by and the competition is fierce. Most magpies will not secure a territory — let alone breed — until they are at least five years old. In fact, only about 14% of adult magpies ever succeed in breeding.

The difference between simply not swooping someone and a real friendship manifests in several ways. When magpies have formed an attachment, they will often show their trust, for example, by formally introducing their offspring. They may allow their chicks to play near people, not fly away when a resident human is approaching, and actually approach or roost near a human.

In rare cases, they may even join in human activity. On one extraordinary occasion, an adult female magpie gingerly entered my house on foot, and hopped over to my desk where I was sitting. She watched me type on the keyboard and even looked at the screen. I had to get up to take a phone call and when I returned, the magpie had taken up a position at my keyboard, pecked the keys gently, and then looked at the “results” on the screen.

The bird was curious about everything I did. She also wanted to play with me and found my shoelaces particularly attractive, pulling them and then running away a little only to return for another go.

Importantly, it was the bird that had begun to take the initiative and had chosen to socially interact and such behavior, as research has shown particularly in primates, is part of the basis of social bonds and friendships.

Risky business
If magpies can be so good with humans, how can one explain their swooping at people? It’s worth bearing in mind that swooping magpies do not act in aggression or anger but as nest defenders. The strategy they choose is based on risk assessment.

A risk is posed by someone who is unknown and was not present at the time of nest building, which unfortunately is often the case in public places and parks. That person is then classified as a territorial intruder and thus a potential risk to their family. At this point the male guarding the nest performs a warning swoop, literally asking a person to step away from the nest area.

If warnings are ignored, the adult male may try to conduct a near-contact swoop aimed at the head. Magpie swooping is generally a defensive action taken when someone unknown approaches who the magpie believes intends harm. It is not an arbitrary attack.

When I was swooped for the first time in a public place, I slowly walked over to the other side of the road. Importantly, I allowed the male to study my face and appearance from a safe distance, so he could remember me in the future. This is a useful strategy since we now know that magpies remember human faces.

A sure way of escalating conflict is to fence them with a device like an umbrella or to run away at high speed. This approach may well confirm for the magpie that the person concerned is dangerous and needs to be fought with every available strategy.

In dealing with magpies, de-escalating a perceived conflict is usually the best strategy.

Paragraph 3 refines the author's ideas in the article by —

A. explaining how birds' and people's approaches to friendship differ.

B. showing that people can form friendships with various species of animals.

C. suggesting that providing birds with food and shelter is an important part of friendship.

D. distinguishing between what does and does not qualify as a friendship between birds and humans.

The correct answer is D. distinguishing between what does and does not qualify as a friendship between birds and humans.

In paragraph 3, the author clarifies that while many bird species can become tame enough to take food from humans, this behavior does not constitute true "friendship." The author emphasizes the unique bond that can develop between magpies and people, which is more meaningful than simply accepting food.