In order to determine whether Evidence 1 better supports the solid sphere model or the plum pudding model, we need to refer to the given video "RC Unit 3: Demo - Cathode Ray Tube" for context. Unfortunately, as an AI text-based model, I don't have access to the specific content of the video. However, I can provide you with some general information about these models to help you draw a conclusion.
The solid sphere model, also known as the nuclear model, was proposed by Ernest Rutherford. According to this model, atoms consist of a small, dense nucleus at the center, which contains protons and neutrons, while electrons orbit around the nucleus.
On the other hand, the plum pudding model, proposed by J.J. Thomson, suggests that atoms are composed of a positively charged pudding-like material with negatively charged electrons embedded throughout it.
Based on this information, I can provide some analysis. If Evidence 1 shows characteristics that support the presence of a small, dense nucleus at the center of the atom, it would align with the solid sphere model. Additionally, if it indicates electrons orbiting around the nucleus, it would further support this model.
However, if Evidence 1 suggests that there is a pudding-like material with electrons embedded throughout it, it would lean towards the plum pudding model.
Without specific details about Evidence 1 from the video, it is not possible to make a definite conclusion. It would require further examination and analysis of the evidence to determine whether it aligns more with the solid sphere model or the plum pudding model.
the video:RC Unit 3: Demo - Cathode Ray Tube
Does Evidence 1 better support the solid sphere model or the plum pudding model. Explain your reasoning.(2pts)
1 answer
1 answer