The reporter's point of view seems to be one of condemnation towards the socialists and rioters, portraying them as instigators of violence and chaos. The language used, such as "inflammatory character", "disturbance", "riotous demeanor", and "frantic desire for blood", indicates a negative bias towards the individuals involved in the incident.
This report likely influenced readers by portraying the socialists and rioters in a negative light, potentially swaying public opinion against their cause. The emphasis on the violent actions of the mob and their use of bombs and pistols may have generated fear and outrage among readers, leading them to view the incident as a dangerous and unacceptable display of dissent.
The utterances of the speakers were still of a most inflammatory character, however, and the hearers who still remained grew riotous in demeanor.
The police concluded to put an end to the disturbance, and advancing, ordered the crowd to disperse.
At first the socialists fell back slowly, one of the speakers still urging them to stand firm.
Suddenly the bombs were thrown. The police retorted instantly with a volley from their revolvers.
The rioters answered with theirs, which shots showed they were provided with pistols. The mob appeared crazed with a frantic desire for blood and holding its ground, poured volley after volley into the midst of the officers.
Based on the news article excerpt, what is the reporter's point of view? How do you think this report influenced readers?
1 answer
1 answer