The long-term effect of the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona was that police nationwide were required to inform suspects of their rights upon arrest. This ruling established the requirement for what is now known as "Miranda rights," ensuring that suspects are informed of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney. This decision fundamentally changed police procedures across the United States, impacting how confessions and interrogations are conducted in criminal cases. Consequently, the correct answer to your question is "police nationwide were required to inform suspects of their rights upon arrest."
The United States Supreme Court case Miranda versus Arizona held that criminal confessions cannot be used in a court case, unless the suspect was fully informed of his or her rights in order to uphold that of the constitution use the passage to answer the question what was a long-term effect of this decision with the answer be in Arizona were forced to release suspects upon arrest or police nationwide were trying to suspect their rights upon a rest or police in Arizona more evidence than confessions or was it nationwide relied on evidence on confessions
1 answer