The long-term effect of the decision in Miranda v. Arizona was that police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest. This established the requirement for officers to inform suspects of their rights, commonly known as "Miranda rights," which is a crucial aspect of police procedure across the United States.
The United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona held that criminal confessions cannot be used in a court case unless the suspect was fully informed of his or her rights, in order to uphold the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. Use the passage to answer the question. What was a long-term effect of this decision? (1 point) Responses Police in Arizona were forced to release suspects upon arrest. Police in Arizona were forced to release suspects upon arrest. Police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest. Police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest. Police in Arizona relied more on evidence than on confessions. Police in Arizona relied more on evidence than on confessions. Police nationwide relied more on evidence than on confessions.
1 answer