The Trouble with Text Speak (Article One)

Question

"c u soon :-)! wud u go 2day?" Anyone who regularly sends and receives electronic messages likely understood the meanings of the previous statement and question right away. This string of words, which vaguely resembles sentences, employs techspeak, sometimes also known as text speak. This new way of writing is changing the English language, and not for the better.
The Destruction of English

Before people began typing messages on tiny screens, there were rules for formal written English that teens and adults alike tried to follow, whether they were composing friendly letters or preparing scientific reports. Since texting has become an important mode of communication, many of these rules have essentially been tossed out the window. Don't worry about the right way to spell something! As long as the person reading your message can figure out what you are trying to say, it's fine the way it is. Capital letters and periods? Why bother? Is there really any point in writing "I don't know" when "idk" will be understood? This overly relaxed attitude and approach is destroying the English language.
Declining Grammar Skills

Teachers have suspected for years that students' grammar skills have declined because of techspeak. At least one study suggests this hunch is correct. Researchers gave students a grammar test assessing skills they had been taught in school. They found that the more often teens sent or received messages that contained text speak, the worse they performed on the test.

Common errors associated with the frequent use of techspeak include using abbreviations ("imho" in place of "in my humble opinion") and spelling words based solely on how they sound instead of looking them up in a dictionary. Writing "wut "instead of "what" or "gr8" instead of "great" are two examples of this practice.
The Inability to Turn Off Techspeak

The most concerning issue related to techspeak is not that people shorten words or use symbols to communicate their thoughts and feelings quickly and efficiently to peers. It's that many people do not recognize that this style of writing is not suitable for all applications. Further, they are unable to switch from this informal style to the proper one expected by educators and employers. For example, some research shows that the majority of students currently in middle school and high school have used techspeak in their school assignments. About 25 percent have used symbols such as smiley faces.
Writing for Success

Many teens view techspeak as an acceptable mode of written communication. On the other hand, many—older—English teachers and recruiters in charge of hiring new employees do not. Young people who do not have the knowledge and skills needed to switch from text speak to a more formal writing style that uses proper spelling, sentence structure, and punctuation are less likely to be successful in school and in certain careers.

The English Language: New and Improved (Article Two)

Not so long ago, people communicated with others by talking on the telephone or writing lengthy letters in flowing script. Now, texting or online messaging is the method preferred by many. This practice has changed the way people write words and compose sentences in certain situations, but it has not harmed our language as some suggest.
Our Ever-Evolving English Language

One thing that is true of most people is that they do not like change. The attitudes of those who witnessed the development of techspeak clearly illustrate this statement. Many are raising the alarm bells and claiming that the English language is being destroyed. What they forget is that language does not stay the same forever. It is constantly changing.

Before the emergence of Late Modern English, for instance, there was Old English, Middle English, and even Early Modern English. Consider the following lines written in Old English: "HWÆT, WE GAR-DEna in geardagum / þeodcyninga þrym gefrunon / hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon!" They are from the well-known epic poem Beowulf, which is thought to date back to the eighth century. The average reader today does not understand a single word.
Retaining Essential Writing Skills

A common argument against frequent texting is that it will cause individuals to lose the ability to write properly. One study finding appears to contradict this. Frequent texters often omit capital letters and periods in their messages. However, when those same young people took a grammar test, they were able to apply the capitalization and punctuation rules they learned in school just fine.
The Genius of Text Speak

Far from suggesting that human intelligence is on the decline, the development of techspeak illustrates the opposite. People who had to spell out words on tiny keyboards found it time-consuming, and they wanted to get their point across faster. They knew that shorter messages cost less to send. What emerged as a result was a brand-new form of writing that was still effective yet much more efficient. There are now two writing systems: one for casual text chats, and one for situations where a higher degree of formality is required.
Techspeak in the Future

Educators and employers who grew up without techspeak will likely continue to argue against its use. For now, those who hope to get good grades and land dream jobs need to be able to switch seamlessly between techspeak and conventional English. However, it is easy to envision a future in which the use of "u" instead of "you" in an online cover letter won't be a reason for a supervisor to move an entire application to the recycle bin. As young people who grew up with techspeak assume positions of power in society, they will accept it for what it is—a valid form of written English that was developed for the electronic age.

Read both of the articles about text speak and then Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples. You must include specific examples and textual evidence to support your thoughts, and your response must be at least 6 sentences.

Answer 1

Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can significantly enhance its persuasiveness by demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the topic and addressing potential counterarguments. For instance, in Article One, the author presents a clear stance against techspeak, claiming it damages the English language and that "students' grammar skills have declined because of techspeak.” By acknowledging the widespread use of techspeak among teens, the author strengthens their argument by showing awareness of its acceptance in contemporary communication. Conversely, Article Two counters this perspective by arguing that techspeak is simply an evolution of language, stating, “Language does not stay the same forever. It is constantly changing.” This acknowledgment of change helps to validate the concerns of traditionalists while providing a fresh outlook that can resonate with readers who value progress and adaptation.

Furthermore, by including research findings, such as those that indicate frequent texters can still apply grammar rules accurately, Article Two undermines the criticism presented in Article One. This evidence can sway readers who may initially side with the conventional viewpoint by providing a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of techspeak. Such inclusivity invites readers to engage with the argument more critically, leading to deeper consideration of its validity, ultimately making the argument more persuasive. In sum, presenting conflicting views and substantial evidence enriches the rhetoric and appeals to a broader audience, fostering a more balanced discourse.

Answer 2

Uhm try again

Answer 3

Incorporating a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can significantly enhance its persuasiveness by showcasing a deeper understanding of the issue and anticipating objections from the audience. For instance, in Article One, the author argues that techspeak is harming the English language, citing a study that found students' grammar skills decline with frequent use of text speak. By presenting this evidence, the author seeks to strengthen their case and appeal to readers who are concerned about educational standards. However, Article Two counters this by declaring that language is constantly evolving and includes studies showing that teens can still apply proper grammar rules effectively despite their use of techspeak.

By acknowledging this opposing viewpoint, the second article enriches the conversation and suggests that techspeak can coexist with traditional writing. This approach helps to engage readers who may be skeptical of the strict condemnation of techspeak, allowing them to consider that change in language can also signify progress rather than decline. The contrasting views invite readers to explore the complexities of the subject, making them more likely to reflect on their own opinions. Thus, including conflicting points of view and supporting evidence fosters a more thorough and convincing argument, appealing to diverse perspectives and promoting critical thought.

Answer 4

bro why not ease into the paragraph??

Answer 5

Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can significantly strengthen its persuasiveness by presenting a more balanced perspective. When writers acknowledge opposing views, it shows they understand the complexities of the issue at hand, which can build credibility with readers. For example, Article One argues that techspeak is damaging the English language, citing research that links its use to declining grammar skills. This claim resonates with readers who value traditional writing conventions. However, Article Two counters this perspective by stating that language is constantly evolving and highlights a study showing that frequent texters still perform well on grammar tests.

By including such evidence, the second article broadens the discussion and suggests that techspeak can coexist with proper language use, which can engage readers who may initially oppose it. Acknowledging these different viewpoints allows readers to explore various angles of the argument, encouraging them to think critically about their own stance. Ultimately, presenting conflicting opinions and supporting evidence not only enriches the dialogue but also creates a more compelling argument that appeals to a diverse audience.

Answer 6

No, no, no, NO.

MAKE IT SMOOTH

Answer 7

Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive by demonstrating an understanding of the complexities surrounding an issue. When an author acknowledges opposing views, it shows they are aware of different perspectives, which can enhance their credibility. For instance, in Article One, the author argues that techspeak harms the English language, supported by research indicating that students’ grammar skills have declined due to its use. This raises valid concerns for readers who prioritize traditional writing standards. Conversely, Article Two counters this argument by asserting that language is constantly evolving and providing evidence that frequent texters can still apply grammar rules effectively, even if they often omit proper punctuation and capitalization.

By presenting these conflicting viewpoints, the second article invites readers to consider that techspeak may not be as detrimental as some suggest. This balanced approach can resonate with a wider audience and encourage readers to reflect on their own beliefs about language use. Ultimately, incorporating opposing perspectives and credible evidence enriches the argument and fosters a more nuanced discussion, making the overall message more compelling and relatable to diverse readers.

Answer 8

Do you know what make it smooth means?

Answer 9

I apologize for not meeting your expectations earlier. Let's try again with a smoother and more cohesive approach:

When crafting an argument, including conflicting points of view and supporting evidence can greatly enhance its persuasiveness. By acknowledging opposing perspectives, an author demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the topic, which can build trust with readers. For example, in Article One, the author expresses concern that techspeak is damaging the English language, citing research showing that this informal writing style correlates with declining grammar skills among students. This point resonates with those who value the integrity of written communication. However, Article Two offers a contrasting viewpoint, suggesting that language naturally evolves over time, and presents evidence that frequent texters can still apply grammar rules effectively when required.

This acknowledgment of differing opinions enriches the dialogue and encourages readers to think critically about their own beliefs regarding techspeak. By including both sides of the argument, the author creates a more balanced discussion, inviting readers to explore the complexities of language in the digital age. Ultimately, blending these conflicting viewpoints with concrete evidence fosters a more persuasive argument, appealing to a wider audience and promoting thoughtful consideration of the issues at hand.

Answer 10

and use the articles (as in quote it)

Answer 11

Incorporating conflicting points of view and evidence in an argument can significantly enhance its persuasiveness, as it showcases a well-rounded understanding of the topic. For example, in Article One, the author argues that techspeak is detrimental by stating, “Teachers have suspected for years that students' grammar skills have declined because of techspeak.” This statement resonates with readers who hold traditional views about language and education. However, Article Two counters this perspective by asserting, “Frequent texters often omit capital letters and periods in their messages. However, when those same young people took a grammar test, they were able to apply the capitalization and punctuation rules they learned in school just fine.” By emphasizing this point, the second article suggests that techspeak may not undermine grammar skills as severely as critics claim.

By presenting these conflicting viewpoints, the second article invites readers to consider the positive aspects of language evolution, ultimately arguing that “there are now two writing systems: one for casual text chats, and one for situations where a higher degree of formality is required.” Such recognition of varying perspectives encourages readers to reflect on their own beliefs about techspeak and its place in communication today. In this way, including opposing viewpoints with supporting evidence fosters a more nuanced and compelling argument that appeals to a wider audience and promotes thoughtful engagement with the topic.