Incorporating a conflicting point of view and supporting evidence into an argument can significantly enhance its persuasiveness by demonstrating the writer's thorough understanding of the topic and acknowledging opposing perspectives, which can build credibility. For instance, in "The Trouble with Text Speak," the author might present an argument against the detrimental effects of abbreviated language on literacy, only to acknowledge that many educators concede that text speak can enhance communication among younger generations (Author, Year). By doing so, the writer cultivates a more nuanced discussion, which can resonate with readers who might initially disagree or have a different perspective. Additionally, presenting evidence, such as studies showing that texting can improve certain cognitive abilities (Author, Year), can further bolster the argument, making it more compelling. Ultimately, by embracing a holistic view of the subject, the author not only appeals to logic but also addresses emotional resonances that may exist within the audience, leading to a more persuasive and impactful argument.
Works Cited:
Author Last Name, First Name. "The Trouble with Text Speak." Journal or Book Title, vol. #, no. #, Year, pp. page numbers.
Author Last Name, First Name. "The English Language: New and Improved." Journal or Book Title, vol. #, no. #, Year, pp. page numbers.
(Note: Replace "Author", "Year", and publication details with actual information when citing the works.)