Including a conflicting point of view and supporting evidence in an argument can greatly enhance its persuasiveness by demonstrating thorough consideration of the issue and acknowledging opposing perspectives. This approach builds credibility and trust with readers, as it shows that the author is not merely dismissing alternate viewpoints but engaging with them thoughtfully. For instance, in a discussion on the challenges posed by text speak to formal English, an author might present the argument that text speak can enhance communication efficiency among younger generations. By citing studies showing that text speak facilitates quicker exchanges in digital conversations, the author can then effectively counter this position by emphasizing the potential long-term consequences on language skills and academic writing. This balanced presentation allows readers to see the complexity of the issue, prompting them to critically evaluate the arguments rather than taking a one-sided position. Ultimately, presenting a nuanced discussion encourages deeper engagement and can lead to a more persuasive argument overall.
"The Trouble with Text Speak" and "The English Language: New and Improved"
Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
1 answer
1 answer