Ask a New Question
Menu

The topic is mental health in the 1930s and the research question is what was mental health like in the 1930s find three sources that are credible and explain how you assess the sources credibility for all 3, 3 different times

1 answer

Here are three credible sources you can use to research mental health in the 1930s, along with an explanation of how to assess their credibility.

Source 1: Book - "The History of Mental Illness: From Medieval Times to the Present" by Edward Shorter

Assessment of Credibility:

  1. Authorship: Edward Shorter is a well-respected historian and psychiatrist known for his scholarly work on the history of psychiatry and mental health. His credentials lend authority to the text.
  2. Publication: The book has been published by a reputable academic publisher, which typically employs rigorous editorial standards, indicating that the content has been evaluated for accuracy and scholarship.
  3. References: The book contains extensive references to primary sources and other academic literature, illustrating thorough research and making it a reliable source for academic inquiry.

Source 2: Journal Article - "The Mental Hygiene Movement in the 1930s" published in the American Journal of Public Health

Assessment of Credibility:

  1. Peer-Reviewed: As an article published in a peer-reviewed journal, it has undergone a vetting process by experts in the field, ensuring the validity and reliability of the research.
  2. Publication Date: Being a scholarly journal article, it is current and provides up-to-date interpretations of historical data, while contextualizing findings within modern beliefs about mental health.
  3. Citation Metrics: The article may be cited by other researchers in related fields, which can indicate its influence and acceptance among scholars studying mental health history.

Source 3: Website - National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) - History of Mental Health

Assessment of Credibility:

  1. Authority: The NIMH is a federal agency and authoritative body specializing in mental health research. Government-backed organizations are known for providing factual and unbiased information.
  2. Accuracy: The content is likely to be reviewed and curated by professionals in the field, ensuring the information is accurate and up to date.
  3. Reputability: The NIMH acts as a reliable resource for understanding mental health issues, including historical perspectives, providing a solid foundation for academic use.

These three sources together provide a comprehensive overview of mental health in the 1930s, and their credibility is backed by the authorship, publication processes, and institutional authority associated with each source.