The team plucked wild bumblebees from 19 sites around northern Vermont. Some sites were close to a commercial apiary - within 0.2 miles or a short city block - while others were farther away - at least 0.6 miles. If honeybees were present, the

researchers collected them too. The team then measured the number of viruses stuck to each bee. Just because an animal has a virus on its outside doesn't mean it has an infection. You may have touched your friend's influenza-

soaked tissue, but washed your hands before the flu

infected you. So the researchers also tested each

bee for virus genetic material, which is only made

once the virus infects a host.

The team looked at two viruses - deformed wing virus and black queen cell virus - both of which infect honeybees and bumblebees. These infections can potentially cause significant colony damage in honeybees, but researchers don't know yet what they do to bumblebee colonies.

To figure out how honeybee viruses are jumping to bumblebees, the researchers collected flower samples. Back in the lab, they tested ground-up flowers for viruses and mapped how close the contaminated flowers were to apiaries. They suspected that bees shed virus pieces on flowers during foraging.

Use the article excerpt below to answer the question.

The article claimed that actions humans take to help honeybees may harm wild bumblebees.

What best describes the type of evidence used in this section to support that claim?

(1 point)

The author gave a detailed description of how viruses live and spread.

The author described the type of study scientists used to assess the problem.

The author made specific claims based on a scientific study.

The author provided detailed findings from a scientific study.

3 answers

The best description of the type of evidence used in this section to support the claim that actions humans take to help honeybees may harm wild bumblebees is:

The author made specific claims based on a scientific study.

This choice captures the essence of how the author supports the claim without getting into overly technical details or providing extensive findings.

This is clearly correct? Just to make sure

Yes, based on the information provided in the article excerpt, the statement "The author made specific claims based on a scientific study" is indeed the best description of the type of evidence used to support the claim that actions humans take to help honeybees may harm wild bumblebees.

The excerpt discusses the researchers' methods, findings, and the implications of their study regarding the potential impact of viruses on bumblebees as a result of honeybee management practices. This aligns with making specific claims derived from the scientific study they conducted.

If you have further questions or need clarification on any part, feel free to ask!

Similar Questions
  1. "Are Commercial Honeybees Making Wild Bees Sick?"by Berly McCoy The team plucked wild bumblebees from 19 sites around northern
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. "Are Commercial Honeybees Making Wild Bees Sick?"by Berly McCoy The team plucked wild bumblebees from 19 sites around northern
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. "Are Commercial Honeybees Making Wild Bees Sick?"by Berly McCoy The team plucked wild bumblebees from 19 sites around northern
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. "Are Commercial Honeybees Making Wild Bees Sick?"by Berly McCoy The team plucked wild bumblebees from 19 sites around northern
    1. answers icon 3 answers
more similar questions