The table shows a relationship between the amount of time spent walking and the number of calories burned. Determine if the relationship is proportional.

(1 point)
Responses

The relationship is non-proportional; the graph would be an arc.
The relationship is non-proportional; the graph would be an arc.

The relationship is proportional.
The relationship is proportional.

The relationship is non-proportional; the graph does not pass through the origin.
The relationship is non-proportional; the graph does not pass through the origin.

The proportional relationship cannot be determined from the information provided.

1 answer

To determine if the relationship between the amount of time spent walking and the number of calories burned is proportional, we need to consider two main criteria:

  1. Constant Ratio: In a proportional relationship, the ratio of calories burned to time spent walking should be constant.

  2. Origin: The relationship must pass through the origin (0, 0) meaning that if no time is spent walking, no calories are burned.

If you have a table of values showing the time spent walking and the corresponding calories burned, you can check if these two conditions apply.

Without seeing the specific table, I can advise you on how to analyze it:

  • If every ratio of calories burned to time spent walking is the same and if it passes through (0, 0), then the relationship is proportional.
  • If the ratios vary or if the graph does not pass through the origin, then it is non-proportional.

Given the responses, if you find that it either fails to meet these criteria, you can select:

  • The relationship is non-proportional; the graph does not pass through the origin. (if it doesn't start at (0,0))
  • The relationship is non-proportional; the graph would be an arc. (if it curves and doesn't maintain a constant ratio)
  • The relationship is proportional. (if it maintains a constant ratio and passes through (0, 0))

If the information is insufficient to make a conclusion, you can select:

  • The proportional relationship cannot be determined from the information provided.

If you provide more specifics, I can help you more accurately determine the nature of the relationship!

Similar Questions
  1. Use the table to answer the question.Time walking (minutes) 20 30 40 60 80 Calories burned 100 150 200 300 400 The table shows a
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Use the table to answer the question.Time walking (minutes) 20 30 40 60 80 Calories burned 100 150 200 300 400 The table shows a
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Use the table to answer the question.Time walking (walking): | 20 | 30 | 40 | 60 | 80 | Calories burned: | 100 | 150 | 200 | 300
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Time walking (minutes) 20 30 40 60 80 Calories burned 100 150 200 300 400The table shows a relationship between the amount of
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions