The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point) Responses

Question

Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.
The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.

Answer 1

In the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994), the Supreme Court ruled that using peremptory challenges based on gender was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, not the Sixth Amendment. The case specifically addressed the issue of gender discrimination in the jury selection process, as the prosecutors dismissed male jurors in an effort to create a more favorable jury composition for their case involving child support.

Therefore, the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did is:

Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

While this statement does not reference the correct constitutional ground, it reflects the essence of the ruling regarding gender-based peremptory challenges. It is important to note that the ruling was grounded in equal protection principles rather than exclusively within the context of the Sixth Amendment.