The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point)ResponsesPeremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.

Answer 1

The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) is that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment. The case involved prosecutors using peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool, which was seen as discriminatory on the basis of gender. The ruling in this case established that gender-based peremptory challenges violated a defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment to a fair and impartial jury.