The statement below is from a document.

Question

"Without support from Congress or the President, efforts to avoid compliance with enacted law are not likely to succeed."



What conclusion can be drawn from the statement?

(1 point)
Responses

It is illegal to suspend mail delivery.
It is illegal to suspend mail delivery.

It is illegal to suspend fire services.
It is illegal to suspend fire services.

It is illegal to suspend police services.
It is illegal to suspend police services.

It is illegal to suspend trash collection.

Answer 1

Based on the statement, the conclusion that can be drawn is that without support from Congress or the President, attempts to avoid complying with laws (including those related to public services) are unlikely to succeed. Thus, the options provided regarding the legality of suspending essential services may imply that such actions would require appropriate legal backing from governing authorities.

However, none of the provided responses (suspending mail delivery, fire services, police services, or trash collection) are directly derived from the statement. The statement does not specifically make a claim about the legality of suspending these services.

Therefore, it is not possible to conclusively determine which of these services is illegal to suspend based solely on the given statement.

If you need to select an option based solely on the phrasing of the question, the best conclusion is that all of these actions would likely need Congressional or Presidential support to be deemed compliant or legal, but none of them can be definitively stated as illegal based on the provided information alone.

In summary, none of the options can be conclusively confirmed as illegal without additional context.

Answer 2

which one would make the most sense out of the others

Answer 3

If we're to select one of the options that might make the most sense in relation to the statement about the likelihood of avoiding compliance with enacted law without support from Congress or the President, "It is illegal to suspend police services" could be considered the most relevant choice.

This is because police services are often mandated by law and supported at the legislative level, making them more likely to require official backing for any changes or suspensions. In many jurisdictions, law enforcement is seen as a critical public service necessary for maintaining order, and thus, legally suspending such services may be more contentious and less likely to succeed without proper authorization.

However, it's important to note that the original statement doesn't explicitly refer to any of the options, so this conclusion is an inferred relationship rather than a direct result of the statement itself.