In this passage, the author emphasizes the lack of benefits that colonists would gain from remaining connected to Great Britain. By invoking logic and reason, they challenge supporters of reconciliation to provide any evidence of advantages that would come from such a relationship. The author presents a clear, rational argument that suggests the risks of reconciliation could be dire, hinting at the potential for future conflict. Through this appeal to reason, the author seeks to persuade readers to reconsider their stance on the relationship with Britain, suggesting that the consequences of continued ties may far outweigh any perceived benefits.
The second paragraph appeals to colonists’ sense of
reason
.
I dread the event of a reconciliation with Britain now, as it is more than probable, that it will followed by a revolt ... the consequences of which may be far more fatal than all the malice of Britain.
I challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation, to show, a single advantage that this continent can reap, by being connected with Great Britain. I repeat the challenge, not a single advantage is derived.
1 answer