To model the situation with a two-variable inequality, let's define two variables:
- Let \( x \) represent the number of adult tickets.
- Let \( y \) represent the number of children's tickets.
The cost of adult tickets is $15, and the cost of children's tickets is $12. Therefore, the inequality that models their total spending would be:
\[ 15x + 12y \leq 150 \]
Next, we need to consider the contextual constraints:
- Non-negativity Constraint: The number of tickets can't be negative, so we have:
- \( x \geq 0 \)
- \( y \geq 0 \)
Now, we evaluate the given points to see if they satisfy both the inequality and the non-negativity constraints.
-
Point (2, 5):
- \( 15(2) + 12(5) = 30 + 60 = 90 \leq 150 \) (satisfies the inequality)
- \( 2 \geq 0 \) and \( 5 \geq 0 \) (satisfies the non-negativity constraints)
-
Point (10, 5):
- \( 15(10) + 12(5) = 150 + 60 = 210 \not\leq 150 \) (does not satisfy the inequality)
-
Point (3, 4.5):
- \( 15(3) + 12(4.5) = 45 + 54 = 99 \leq 150 \) (satisfies the inequality)
- \( 3 \geq 0 \) (satisfies the non-negativity constraint, but \( 4.5 \) is not an integer, which may not be appropriate for number of tickets)
-
Point (−3, 5):
- Negative value for \( x \); \( -3 < 0 \) (does not satisfy the non-negativity constraint)
From this evaluation, the viable solution that meets the conditions set out in the problem is:
- Point (2, 5).
So, the answer is (2, 5).