To complete the proof, the correct option to fill in the blank is:
MS and QS.
Here's the reasoning:
- Triangles \( \triangle MNS \) and \( \triangle QRS \) can be compared.
- Since \( \triangle MNQ \) is isosceles with \( MN = MQ \), then by definition, the angles \( \angle MNS \) and \( \angle QRS \) are congruent (base angles of the isosceles triangle).
- It is also given that \( MS \) and \( QS \) are segments formed by the points of the triangle and thus they intersect at the midpoint \( S \), making \( MS \) and \( QS \) congruent.
- Since we have two pairs of congruent sides and one pair of congruent angles between the two triangles, we can apply the SAS (Side-Angle-Side) criterion.
Therefore, the segments MS and QS are congruent by the definition of bisector.