Jury’s Verdict in The Little Mermaid Case:
Verdict: The jury finds in favor of Ariel, the Little Mermaid.
Justification for the Verdict: The jury determined that Ariel had the right to seek out her own identity and happiness, which included pursuing a relationship with Prince Eric. The evidence presented showed that Ursula, the sea witch, had manipulated Ariel into signing a contract that effectively took away her voice. This was seen as deceptive and unfair, as Ariel was not fully aware of the consequences of her actions when she made the deal.
Burden of Proof: The burden of proof was met by Ariel’s side, which successfully demonstrated that Ursula had acted in bad faith. The jury found that it was Ursula who violated the terms of their agreement by using Ariel's voice for her own gain, showcasing that Ariel’s rights were infringed upon. The evidence, including testimonies from other sea creatures, helped illustrate Ursula’s deceitful nature and emphasized Ariel's innocence and genuine desire for a better life.
In summary, the jury believed that Ariel's quest for love and self-discovery was valid, and the actions of Ursula were unjust, leading to a favorable verdict for Ariel.