To complete the proof that angle 2 is congruent to angle 3, we can use the properties of parallel lines cut by a transversal. Here’s how you can fill in the blanks:
Statement:
-
Line k is parallel to line m.
Reason: Given -
Angle 1 is congruent to Angle 3.
Reason: Alternate interior angles (since k || m and t is a transversal) -
Angle 2 is supplement to Angle 1.
Reason: Linear pair (angles adjacent to each other on the same line) -
Angle 3 is supplement to Angle 4.
Reason: Linear pair (angles adjacent to each other on the same line) -
Angle 1 + Angle 2 = 180°
Reason: Definition of supplementary angles -
Angle 3 + Angle 4 = 180°
Reason: Definition of supplementary angles -
Since angle 3 is congruent to angle 1, then angle 2 is also congruent to angle 3.
Reason: Transitive property of equality/congruence
So, you can fill in the blanks as follows:
- Blank space 28: Angle 1
- Blank space 29: Angle 3
- Blank space 30: Angle 2
- Blank space 31: Angle 1
- Blank space 32: Angle 4
- Blank space 33: Angle 1
- Blank space 34: Angle 2
- Blank space 35: Angle 3
- Blank space 36: Angle 4
Here's the final arrangement for clarity:
| Statement | Reason | |---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| | Line k is parallel to line m. | Given | | Angle 1 is congruent to Angle 3. | Alternate interior angles | | Angle 2 is supplement to Angle 1. | Linear pair | | Angle 3 is supplement to Angle 4. | Linear pair | | Angle 1 + Angle 2 = 180° | Definition of supplementary angles | | Angle 3 + Angle 4 = 180° | Definition of supplementary angles | | Since angle 3 is congruent to angle 1, then angle 2 is also congruent to angle 3. | Transitive property of equality/congruence |
This proof establishes that Angle 2 is congruent to Angle 3 using parallel lines cut by a transversal.