The impact of artificial intelligence in higher education. Essay using rogerian method

Answer 1

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education has had a profound impact on the educational landscape. While some argue that AI threatens human intelligence and will replace traditional teaching methods, others believe that AI can enhance the learning experience and promote critical thinking. In this essay, I will present both perspectives using the Rogerian method to find common ground and propose a balanced approach to the use of AI in higher education.

Those who view AI as a threat argue that it undermines the essence of higher education, which is the development of human intelligence. They believe that AI-driven automation in grading papers and conducting assessments diminishes the role of educators, ultimately replacing them with machines. Moreover, they argue that AI-based learning platforms that provide personalized lessons and feedback may lead to a standardized and depersonalized educational experience, reducing the emphasis on critical thinking and creativity.

On the other hand, proponents of AI in higher education contend that it has the potential to revolutionize the learning process. They believe that AI can assist instructors by automating administrative tasks, allowing them to focus more on individualized instruction and mentoring. They argue that AI can provide adaptive learning experiences tailored to individual student needs, thus enhancing engagement and academic achievement. Moreover, AI-powered tools can analyze vast amounts of data to identify learning gaps and provide targeted interventions, empowering students to achieve their full potential.

Despite these differing viewpoints, there is common ground to be found between the two perspectives. Firstly, both sides acknowledge that the role of educators is crucial in higher education. While AI can automate certain tasks, such as grading, it cannot replace the nuanced and contextualized feedback provided by human instructors. Secondly, both sides agree that personalized learning is vital for student success. AI can play a significant role in providing personalized feedback, but human involvement is essential to ensure that students receive the necessary support and guidance.

To strike a balance between these perspectives, a hybrid approach is needed. AI can be leveraged as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for traditional teaching methods. Institutions can use AI to automate administrative tasks, freeing up more time for educators to engage in personalized instruction and mentorship. Additionally, AI-powered platforms can be used to provide adaptive learning experiences, but educators should continuously monitor and supplement these experiences with critical thinking exercises and creative assignments.

In conclusion, the impact of AI in higher education is a complex topic with proponents and critics on both sides. By using the Rogerian method, we can find common ground between these perspectives and propose a balanced approach that harnesses the potential of AI while preserving the vital role of human educators. By embracing AI as a supportive tool, higher education can benefit from technological advancements while ensuring the development of human intelligence and fostering a holistic educational experience.