The graph compares the number of bales of cotton (in millions) produced in a year to the number of enslaved workers (in millions) that year. The data are in this chart: Year Millions of bales of cotton Millions of enslaved workers 1800 0.1 0.9 1810 0.2 1.2 1820 0.3 1.5 1830 0.7 2.0 1840 1.3 2.5 1850 2.1 3.0 1860 3.8 4.0 The graph shows the percent share of cotton production that each state held in the years 1826 and 1859. The data are in this chart: State Percent share in 1826 Percent share in 1859 Georgia 22.7% 15.4% South Carolina 21.2% 6.9% Alabama 13.6% 21.7% Tennessee 13.6% 6.5% Louisiana 11.5% 15.4% Mississippi 6% 26.4% North Carolina 3.1% 3.2% Florida 0.6% 1.5% Other 7.7% 3%

Use the charts to answer the question. Based on the data on the charts, what can be inferred about the states that show an increase of enslaved workers and have low cotton shares? (1 point) Responses Those states used slave labor to grow different crops. Those states used slave labor to grow different crops. Those states used additional slave labor in their factories. Those states used additional slave labor in their factories. Those states had only just begun to grow cotton and had to increase their workforce. Those states had only just begun to grow cotton and had to increase their workforce. Those states were new and data was not available prior to their entry into the Union.

1 answer

Based on the data presented in the charts, the states that show an increase in enslaved workers but have low cotton shares likely utilized slave labor to cultivate different crops. This implication is drawn from the observation that these states may not have primarily focused on cotton production, which explains the lower percentage of cotton share, despite an increase in the enslaved workforce. Thus, the most appropriate response is:

Those states used slave labor to grow different crops.