Samuel A. Worcester would most likely view the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people as disappointing because he argued for the Cherokees' right to their land. The passage reflects his concerns regarding the betrayal of faith and justice towards the Cherokee people and his hope that the Supreme Court would halt the oppression they faced.
"The faith and justice of our nation were at hazard [in danger]. That faith and justice were pledged for the protection of the Cherokees in their rights; but that pledge was apparently about to be forfeited [given up], that faith to be broken, and an act of flagrant [open] robbery to be committed upon a defenceless people, with the sanction [approval] of our national authorities. . . . We hoped that a decision of the Supreme Court might be the occasion of arresting [stopping] the hand of oppression." —Samuel A. Worcester and Elizur Butler, Letter upon their release from prison, 1833QuestionUse the passage to answer the question.How would Samuel A. Worcester most likely view the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people?(1 point)ResponsesHe would be happy because he wanted the Cherokee to be moved to the west.He would be happy because he wanted the Cherokee to be moved to the west.He would be surprised because he expected the Supreme Court to rule in his favor.He would be surprised because he expected the Supreme Court to rule in his favor.He would be disappointed because he argued for the Cherokees' right to their land.He would be disappointed because he argued for the Cherokees' right to their land.He would be surprised because he expected Georgians to change their minds about Indian Removal.
3 answers
pick one
He would be disappointed because he argued for the Cherokees' right to their land.
1 answer