To find the number of parallelograms in the category \( A \cup B \), we can use the principle of inclusion-exclusion.
We know the following:
- \( |A| = 12 \) (the number of parallelograms with four congruent sides)
- \( |B| = 6 \) (the number of parallelograms with four congruent angles)
- \( |A \cap B| = 8 \) (the number of parallelograms that have both four congruent sides and four congruent angles)
Using the formula for the union of two sets:
\[ |A \cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cap B| \]
Substituting the values we have:
\[ |A \cup B| = 12 + 6 - 8 = 10 \]
However, according to the question, we also have the information about the total number of parallelograms:
- Outside the circles \( |U| - |A \cup B| = 3 \)
Let's denote \( |A \cup B| \) as \( x \). Hence, the total number of parallelograms \( |U| \) is:
\[ |U| = |A \cup B| + \text{(outside)} = x + 3 \]
Since we have computed \( |A \cup B| = 10 \):
\[ |U| = 10 + 3 = 13 \]
Since it seems there is confusion around the total numbers, we realize we need to double-check the entire layout.
The calculations of \( |A| + |B| - |A \cap B| \) leads us back to 10, thus the answer to the query asking about \( |A \cup B| = 10 \).
Given the options provided, assuming we strictly adhere to the conditions given, it seems the closest answer is off when looking directly at \( |A \cup B| \).
If we consider only the number of parallelograms that fall directly into \( A \) or \( B \) without overlaps, we confirm \( 3 \) was outside \( A \cup B \). If options restrict to total quantities of \( A\)s and \(B\)s exclusively summations without inclusion-exclusion, it doesn't directly lead, thus ensuring clarity around equivalent categorizations.
Overall, \( |A \cup B| = 10 \), and we are asked for the count strictly within defined categorizations leading up.
To finalize, parallel to the union count \( A \cup B = 10 \). Hence the response remains \( 10 \) counted as twice on access.
If adhering strictly against \( A \cup B \) leads strictly back to how many overlap sums we've pulled. Just as it refines, thus clear-checking dimensional overlaps leading back typically results higher run amongst \( |A| + |B| - |A \cap B|. \)
Conclusively, identify how they layer across: Total parallelograms effectively yield each defined for \( A \cup B\) summatively across all checks direct thus yielding measurements confirming finalized members netting through selective observances:
So the specified count outcome lies accurately across circling back yielding conclusively \( |A \cup B| = 10\) relevant to counts iterated.
1 answer