Frethorne and Farrer offer contrasting perspectives on life in Virginia, reflecting their different experiences and circumstances. Frethorne’s letter reveals a sense of desperation and hardship, as he describes the overwhelming challenges of climate, illness, and food scarcity, lamenting his longing for home and the suffering of his fellow settlers. In contrast, Farrer adopts a more positive tone, highlighting the potential for prosperity and the richness of resources in Virginia, showcasing the opportunities for land ownership and the promising future for settlers. While Frethorne emphasizes the brutal reality of life with his focus on labor and disease, Farrer paints a picture of hope and possibility, mentioning the abundance of crops and the potential for wealth. Moreover, Frethorne's plea for assistance highlights his vulnerability, while Farrer's account underscores a sense of agency and optimism in forging a new life in America.
The descriptions by Frethorne and Farrer about life in Virginia are very different.
In a short paragraph, compare and contrast these letters. In your paragraph, give three examples of differences between how these two men described Virginia.
1 answer
1 answer