The data below was recorded during an investigation of the relationship between potential energy and the mass and height of an object.

Height Data

When a 2 kg weight was lifted 3 meters above the floor, it had 58.8 Joules of potential energy.When a 2 kg weight was lifted 6 meters above the floor, its potential energy doubled.
Mass Data

When a 3 kg weight was lifted 2 meters above the floor, it had 58.8 Joules of potential energy.When a 6 kg weight was lifted 2 meters above the floor, its potential energy doubled.
Which of the following graphs BEST represents the relationship between potential energy and the mass and height of an object?

*
1 point

5 answers

To determine the relationship between potential energy (PE), mass (m), and height (h), we can use the formula for gravitational potential energy:

\[ PE = mgh \]

where \( g \) is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately \( 9.8 , \text{m/s}^2 \)).

From the provided data:

  1. For the 2 kg weight:

    • At a height of 3 meters: \[ PE = 2 \times 9.8 \times 3 = 58.8 , \text{Joules} \]
    • At a height of 6 meters, its potential energy doubles: \[ PE_{6m} = 2 \times 9.8 \times 6 = 117.6 , \text{Joules} \]
  2. For the 3 kg weight:

    • At a height of 2 meters: \[ PE = 3 \times 9.8 \times 2 = 58.8 , \text{Joules} \]
    • For the 6 kg weight lifted to 2 meters, the potential energy doubles: \[ PE_{3kg} = 6 \times 9.8 \times 2 = 117.6 , \text{Joules} \]

Thus, from the data, we observe that:

  • Doubling the height \( (3m \to 6m) \) for a constant mass results in the potential energy also doubling.
  • Doubling the mass \( (3kg \to 6kg) \) while keeping the height constant also doubles the potential energy.

This clearly shows a linear relationship between both mass and height with potential energy.

In terms of graph representation:

  • Potential energy should be on the y-axis.
  • Mass can be on one x-axis, while height can be on another axis, potentially showing two lines indicating that both variables have a direct positive linear relation to potential energy.

To visualize this accurately, look for a graph with linear slopes indicating these dependencies, such as lines increasing steeply for increased height or mass.

Therefore, the graph that best represents the relationship between potential energy, mass, and height would be one that shows this linear relationship growing with both increasing mass and height. However, since there is insufficient detail on the available graph options, look for any option that indicates a positive slope curving upwards consistently with both x-axes showing mass and height.

Will the graph be curved or straight

The graph representing the relationship between potential energy (PE), mass (m), and height (h) will be straight (linear), not curved.

Explanation:

  1. Formula for Potential Energy: The potential energy is given by the formula: \[ PE = mgh \] where:

    • \( PE \) is potential energy,
    • \( m \) is mass,
    • \( g \) is the acceleration due to gravity (a constant), and
    • \( h \) is height.
  2. Linear Relationship:

    • When mass \( m \) is held constant and we plot potential energy against height \( h \), the relationship is linear. As height increases, potential energy increases proportionately.
    • Likewise, when height \( h \) is kept constant and mass \( m \) is varied, the potential energy also increases linearly with mass.

Given these relationships, if you were to plot either:

  • Potential energy vs. height (keeping mass constant), or
  • Potential energy vs. mass (keeping height constant),

you would get straight lines indicating a linear relationship.

Conclusion:

So, the graph representing the relationship between potential energy and either mass or height will be straight, illustrating a direct proportionality.

Thanks love ya

You're welcome! I'm glad I could help. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. Love ya too! 😊