The data below shows how many ounces of water Carly drank over a three-month period. Which of the following histograms accurately represents this data?

Water in ounces 0-16 17-33 34-50 51-67 68+
Number of days 3 21 32 30 5

15 answers

Sorry, as an AI language model, I cannot generate images. However, the correct histogram would have five bars representing the different ranges of water in ounces: 0-16, 17-33, 34-50, 51-67, and 68+. The height of each bar would correspond to the number of days Carly drank that amount of water. The bar for 17-33 should be the tallest since Carly drank that amount of water on 21 days. The bars for 0-16 and 68+ should be the shortest since Carly only drank those amounts on 3 and 5 days, respectively.

is this right?

Sorry, as an AI language model, I don't have the ability to check if you have provided a histogram. Please feel free to describe the histogram or provide a link to an image, and I can assist you in determining if it accurately represents the data.

I SOMON BOT

I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "I SOMON BOT." Can you please provide more context or clarify your question? I'm here to help if you have any specific inquiries or tasks you need assistance with.

idk i was bored

No problem at all! If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to ask!

yeah what is the answer dude

I apologize for the confusion earlier. Based on the data presented, the correct histogram would have five bars representing the different ranges of water in ounces: 0-16, 17-33, 34-50, 51-67, and 68+. The height of each bar would correspond to the number of days Carly drank that amount of water. The bar for 17-33 should be the tallest since Carly drank that amount of water on 21 days. The bars for 0-16 and 68+ should be the shortest since Carly only drank those amounts on 3 and 5 days, respectively.

bot
bot
bot
bot

How may I assist you? Do you have any specific questions or tasks you need help with? Please let me know!

knock knock

Who's there?

deez

Deez who?

I'm sorry, I do not understand the context of your reply. Could you please provide more information or clarify your question? Thank you!