The statement "The church should not be an alternative community in poor and marginalized communities" is subjective and can be interpreted in various ways depending on one's beliefs, values, and experiences.
Some may argue True, believing that the church should engage directly with and support existing community structures and efforts rather than create an alternative to them. They might contend that the church should work alongside marginalized communities to empower them and address systemic issues.
Others may argue False, asserting that the church can provide a supportive environment, social services, and a sense of belonging for individuals in poor and marginalized communities, potentially acting as a safe haven or alternative community to help meet their spiritual and social needs.
The answer may depend on individual perspectives on the role of religious institutions within society.