To determine how the author develops her point of view, we need to analyze the provided options in the context of her work. Here’s a breakdown:
A. an experiment with magpies - If the author conducts an experiment, she may provide empirical evidence to support her perspective.
B. her observations of magpies - Personal observations can illustrate the author’s unique insights and experiences with magpies, potentially painting a vivid picture of their behavior.
C. other friendships across species - Discussing cross-species relationships may broaden the context of her argument and show parallels between magpies and other animals.
D. how taming magpies affects their behavior - This approach might focus on the direct consequences of human interaction with magpies, providing insight into their behavior changes based on taming.
If the author’s point of view is specifically centered around the interaction and impact of taming on magpies, option D might be the best answer. However, if her perspective is more observational in nature, option B could also fit well.
Without specific text, it’s hard to definitively choose one, but based on the clues, if the main focus is about the effects of taming on behavior, D would likely be the most accurate answer. If the emphasis is more on personal insights, then B could be considered.
1 answer