Chart
| | Text 1 | Text 2 | |-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------| | Position | Rosa Parks was an appropriate symbol of the Montgomery bus boycott. | Claudette Colvin should have been the symbol of the Montgomery bus boycott. | | Reason 1/Evidence | Parks was a respected civic leader, making her actions impactful. | Colvin was the first to challenge the law, showing true bravery. | | Reason 2/Evidence | Parks's age (42 years old) lent authority to her actions. | Colvin was only 15, and her youthful defiance is commendable. | | Reason 3/Evidence | Parks acted thoughtfully after considering the consequences. | Colvin acted spontaneously, making her defiance seem more authentic. |
Sample Analytical Paragraph (Level 1)
The two texts present contrasting viewpoints regarding who should symbolize the Montgomery bus boycott: Rosa Parks or Claudette Colvin. Text 1 supports Rosa Parks as the more appropriate symbol, highlighting her status as a respected civic leader whose actions were informed and well-considered, which added authority to her refusal to relinquish her seat. Furthermore, it notes that Parks's age allowed the community to take her more seriously, as she was 42 at the time of her protest. In contrast, Text 2 champions Claudette Colvin, arguing that her earlier and more spontaneous act of defiance set a precedent for civil rights activism. Colvin’s age at 15 is presented as a mark of bravery, contrasting with the thoughtful nature of Parks's actions, which the author believes diminishes their authenticity. This comparison illustrates how both texts utilize evidence around age, authority, and intentionality to argue for their respective symbols of the bus boycott, revealing differing interpretations of courage and leadership in the context of social movements.
Sample Argument Paragraph (Level 2)
While both texts provide compelling arguments regarding the symbol of the Montgomery bus boycott, I find Text 2's position, advocating for Claudette Colvin, to be more convincing. Colvin’s early and spontaneous act of defiance occurred at a pivotal moment, illustrating not only her bravery but also the urgency of the civil rights struggle. Unlike Parks, who is portrayed in Text 1 as a thoughtful leader, Colvin's unplanned protest resonates with raw authenticity, making her actions appear more genuine and impactful. Furthermore, being only 15, Colvin's choice to resist showcased the courage of youth rather than the calculated moves of seasoned activists. In this context, her bravery starkly contrasts the respectability politics often ascribed to older figures. Overall, Colvin's courage and the circumstances surrounding her protest offer a powerful narrative that aligns with the urgency of the civil rights movement, which makes her the more fitting symbol in my view.