To analyze the pay-off table and determine the best alternatives under the mentioned strategies, we will follow these steps for each decision-making criterion:
Payoff Table
| Alternatives | s1 | s2 | s3 | |--------------|----|----|----| | a1 | 100| 40 | 5 | | a2 | 21 | 40 | 60 | | a3 | 70 | 20 | 20 |
Prior Probability
- s1: 0.2
- s2: 0.5
- s3: 0.3
A. MAXIMAX
The maximax criterion focuses on choosing the alternative with the maximum of the maximum payoffs.
- Maximum payoffs:
- a1: max(100, 40, 5) = 100
- a2: max(21, 40, 60) = 60
- a3: max(70, 20, 20) = 70
Choosing the alternative with the highest maximum payoff:
- Choice: a1 (100)
B. MAXIMIN
The maximin criterion focuses on choosing the alternative with the maximum of the minimum payoffs.
- Minimum payoffs:
- a1: min(100, 40, 5) = 5
- a2: min(21, 40, 60) = 21
- a3: min(70, 20, 20) = 20
Choosing the alternative with the highest minimum payoff:
- Choice: a2 (21)
C. LAPLAS
The Laplace criterion assumes equal probabilities for each state of nature.
- Average payoffs:
- a1: (100 + 40 + 5) / 3 = 48.33
- a2: (21 + 40 + 60) / 3 = 40.33
- a3: (70 + 20 + 20) / 3 = 36.67
Choosing the alternative with the highest average payoff:
- Choice: a1 (48.33)
D. MINIMAX REGRET
Calculate the regret table first.
| Alternatives | s1 | s2 | s3 | Max Regret | |--------------|----|----|----|------------| | a1 | 0 | 20 | 55 | 55 | | a2 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 79 | | a3 | 30 | 20 | 40 | 40 |
Max regrets:
- a1: 55
- a2: 79
- a3: 40
Choosing the alternative with the lowest maximum regret:
- Choice: a3 (40)
E. HURWITZ (using a = 0.6)
- Hurwitz value is calculated as
.
Calculating:
- a1:
- a2:
- a3:
Choosing the alternative with the maximum Hurwitz value:
- Choice: a1 (62)
F. EXPECTED MONETARY VALUE
The expected monetary value (EMV) is calculated by multiplying the payoffs by their probabilities.
Choosing the alternative with the highest EMV:
- Choice: a2 (42.2)
G. EXPECTED OPPORTUNITY LOSS
The expected opportunity loss (EOL) represents the average regret for selecting a particular alternative.
Calculate the opportunity losses for each alternative. The EOL values are calculated similarly to the EMV and the best outcomes are:
- EOL(a1) = 0.2 * 0 + 0.5 * 20 + 0.3 * 55 = 0 + 10 + 16.5 = 26.5
- EOL(a2) = 0.2 * 79 + 0.5 * 0 + 0.3 * 0 = 15.8 + 0 + 0 = 15.8
- EOL(a3) = 0.2 * 30 + 0.5 * 20 + 0.3 * 40 = 6 + 10 + 12 = 28
Choosing the alternative with the lowest EOL:
- Choice: a2 (15.8)
H. EXPECTED VALUE UNDER PERFECT INFORMATION
The expected value of perfect information is the difference between the expected value with perfect information and the expected monetary value.
Maximum outcomes for each state (s):
- s1: 100
- s2: 40
- s3: 60
Expected value under perfect information:
In summary, the choices for each strategy are as follows:
Summary of Choices
A. MAXIMAX: a1
B. MAXIMIN: a2
C. LAPLAS: a1
D. MINIMAX REGRET: a3
E. HURWITZ: a1
F. EXPECTED MONETARY VALUE: a2
G. EXPECTED OPPORTUNITY LOSS: a2
H. EXPECTED VALUE UNDER PERFECT INFORMATION: 58