Suppose you developed a map similar to the map shown with a legend showing the geographic origins of silk, spices, cotton, and porcelain. Where would these goods be placed on the map?

(1 point)
Responses

Good Geographic Origin
Silk China
Spices Southeast Asia
Cotton India, the Nile Basin, and Central America
Porcelain China
Good Geographic Origin Silk China Spices Southeast Asia Cotton India, the Nile Basin, and Central America Porcelain China

Good Geographic Origin
Silk China
Spices India
Cotton China and Persia
Porcelain Africa
Good Geographic Origin Silk China Spices India Cotton China and Persia Porcelain Africa

Good Geographic Origin
Silk India
Spices Africa
Cotton India and northern Europe
Porcelain China
Good Geographic Origin Silk India Spices Africa Cotton India and northern Europe Porcelain China

Good Geographic Origin
Silk China
Spices India
Cotton Africa
Porcelain India

11 answers

The correct placements for the geographic origins of the goods would be:

  • Silk: China
  • Spices: Southeast Asia
  • Cotton: India, the Nile Basin, and Central America
  • Porcelain: China

This aligns with historical trade routes and the origins of these goods. Thus, the first response is accurate:

Good Geographic Origin
Silk China
Spices Southeast Asia
Cotton India, the Nile Basin, and Central America
Porcelain China

What was the purpose of the Silk Road?(1 point)
Responses

The purpose of the Silk Road was to trade, sell, and purchase goods from one town to the next using a land-based route.
The purpose of the Silk Road was to trade, sell, and purchase goods from one town to the next using a land-based route.

The purpose of the Silk Road was for India to gain control of the trade route to charge higher taxes.
The purpose of the Silk Road was for India to gain control of the trade route to charge higher taxes.

The purpose of the Silk Road was to trade, sell, and purchase goods from one port to the next using a sea-based route.
The purpose of the Silk Road was to trade, sell, and purchase goods from one port to the next using a sea-based route.

The purpose of the Silk Road was to establish and expand trade routes between Asia and Central America.

The most accurate response regarding the purpose of the Silk Road is:

The purpose of the Silk Road was to trade, sell, and purchase goods from one town to the next using a land-based route.

The Silk Road was a network of trade routes that connected Asia with Europe, facilitating the exchange of goods, culture, and ideas. While it did include trade between various regions and not just towns, the primary purpose was indeed trade using land-based routes.

Use the excerpt to answer the question.

“When we stepped ashore we saw fine green trees, streams everywhere and different kinds of fruit. I called to the two captains to jump ashore with the rest,…asking them to bear solemn witness that in the presence of them all I was taking possession of this island for their Lord and Lady the King and Queen.…Soon many of the islanders gathered round us. I could see that they were people who would be more easily converted to our Holy Faith by love than by coercion.”

Using the excerpt from Christopher Columbus’s journal during his first voyage, which of the following summarizes how Columbus’s and Vasco da Gama’s motivations were different?

(1 point)
Responses

Both had three motivating factors; however, Columbus achieved silk and God, whereas da Gama spread Christianity to the New World.
Both had three motivating factors; however, Columbus achieved silk and God, whereas da Gama spread Christianity to the New World.

Both had three moti

The provided excerpt highlights Columbus's motivations of exploration, claiming territory, and potential conversion of indigenous people to Christianity through peaceful means. In contrast, Vasco da Gama's motivations primarily revolved around establishing a sea route to India for trade, particularly for spices and other valuable goods.

Based on this context, a more appropriate summary that captures the differences between Columbus's and da Gama's motivations could be:

Columbus focused on exploration and claiming new lands while seeking to convert indigenous peoples to Christianity, while da Gama was primarily motivated by trade and establishing direct maritime routes to Asia.

However, since that summary is not part of the options you provided, if you can share the complete list of responses, I can help select the most relevant one.

Which of the following correctly analyzes the ways in which new systems of trade impacted the global economy?(1 point)
Responses

Chinese dynasties in Asia lost wealth from global trade.
Chinese dynasties in Asia lost wealth from global trade.

West African trading empires gained power as new resources became available.
West African trading empires gained power as new resources became available.

Silver mines contributed to the wealth of South American economies.
Silver mines contributed to the wealth of South American economies.

New economic ideas like mercantilism and capitalism enriched European economies.

All of the responses accurately reflect various ways that new systems of trade impacted the global economy. However, if you're looking for the most comprehensive analysis that encapsulates broader economic shifts, the most suitable choice would be:

New economic ideas like mercantilism and capitalism enriched European economies.

This option highlights how new trade systems led to the development of significant economic theories and practices that transformed Europe's economy and increased its wealth through trade.

If you need to choose only one answer based on a single aspect of new trade systems' impact, this one effectively captures the larger economic change. However, the other responses also have merit and reflect specific impacts of trade on various regions.

Which of the following correctly analyzes how the cartaz system represented a departure from previous patterns of trade?(1 point)
Responses

Muslim and Venetian traders gained power as people bought cartazes from them.
Muslim and Venetian traders gained power as people bought cartazes from them.

Portuguese, Muslim, and Venetian traders formed an alliance to share ports and profits using the cartaz system.
Portuguese, Muslim, and Venetian traders formed an alliance to share ports and profits using the cartaz system.

Portuguese ports now had exclusive control of Indian Ocean trade.
Portuguese ports now had exclusive control of Indian Ocean trade.

The cartaz system made few long-lasting or impactful changes.

The most accurate analysis of how the cartaz system represented a departure from previous patterns of trade is:

Portuguese ports now had exclusive control of Indian Ocean trade.

The cartaz was a pass issued by the Portuguese that allowed traders to navigate the Indian Ocean. This system shifted the dynamics of trade by giving the Portuguese a degree of control over maritime trade in that region, which differed from previous, more open trade practices where multiple players could operate without needing specific passes.

While some of the other statements touch on aspects of trade dynamics, they do not accurately reflect the significance of the cartaz system in establishing Portuguese dominance in the Indian Ocean trade.

How does the development of maritime empires compare with the development of land-based empires in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries?(1 point)
Responses

The maritime empires focused on control of trade routes in the Indian Ocean rather than the control of people and land.
The maritime empires focused on control of trade routes in the Indian Ocean rather than the control of people and land.

The maritime empires found themselves bankrupt due to the necessary investment in infrastructure.
The maritime empires found themselves bankrupt due to the necessary investment in infrastructure.

Land-based empires were heavily supported by private individuals and joint-stock companies.
Land-based empires were heavily supported by private individuals and joint-stock companies.

The maritime empires did not have to rely on locals for help in the Indian Ocean.

The response that best compares the development of maritime empires with land-based empires in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries is:

The maritime empires focused on control of trade routes in the Indian Ocean rather than the control of people and land.

This statement effectively captures a fundamental difference between maritime empires, such as those established by Spain and Portugal, which primarily sought to control trade routes and maritime commerce, and land-based empires, which focused on territorial expansion and governance over populations and land. The emphasis on trade routes shows how maritime empires were often more commercially oriented compared to land empires, which sought direct control over land and peoples.