Summarise:

Two arguments against the use of genome editing in reproduction are analysed, namely safety concerns and germline modification. These arguments are then contrasted with arguments in favour of genome editing, in particular with the argument of the child’s welfare and the argument of parental reproductive autonomy. In addition to these two arguments, genome editing could be considered as a worthy alternative to PGD as it may not be subjected to some of the moral critiques moved against this technology.

1 answer

The safety concerns and ethical implications of genome editing in reproduction are discussed as arguments against its use. However, the potential benefits for the child's welfare and parental reproductive autonomy are considered as arguments in favor. Genome editing could also be seen as a potential alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) without some of the moral concerns associated with that technology.
Similar Questions
  1. Summarise:Even if these arguments offer sound reasons in favour of introducing genome editing as a new reproductive option, I
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Summarise in your own words:One of the most pivotal issues motivating the need for global governance of heritable genome
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Summarise:This paper explores the ethics of introducing genome-editing technologies as a new reproductive option. In particular,
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. summarise the evidence in ione sentecethis is the first trial that uses lipid nanoparticles to deliver the genome-editing
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions