To determine which of the options provided would be an invalid inference based on the excerpt, let's analyze each option:
-
People found it important to give the mentally insane a safe place to live.
- This inference could be seen as valid since Bly’s experience in the boarding house suggests an effort to provide a designated space for women who are mentally ill, though it appears quite the opposite.
-
The mentally insane were considered a danger to society.
- This inference seems valid, as Bly was deemed insane and taken away, suggesting a societal perception that those who were mentally ill were a danger or needed to be removed from the general population.
-
Only someone who was medically qualified could declare someone mentally insane.
- This inference is likely invalid based on the context given. The excerpt suggests that Bly was labeled insane by an impatient judge, and there is no indication in the text that any medical qualifications were involved in the determination.
-
People considered the mentally insane to be unable to determine their own status.
- This inference could be valid because Bly’s experience implies that society viewed individuals deemed insane as lacking the ability to assess their own mental health, demonstrated by her inability to convince others of her sanity.
Based on this analysis, the invalid inference to make about the excerpt is:
Only someone who was medically qualified could declare someone mentally insane. This is invalid because the excerpt indicates a judge made the determination without any medical qualification mentioned.