Kirkpatrick’s Model of evaluation is one of the most widely used frameworks for assessing the effectiveness of training and development programs. The model consists of four levels, each serving a different purpose in evaluating training outcomes. Below is a discussion of each of the four levels, along with relevant examples:
1. Level 1: Reaction
Definition: This level measures how participants reacted to the training program. It assesses their initial responses, satisfaction, and engagement with the training content and delivery.
Example: After a customer service training session, participants might be asked to complete a survey or feedback form that includes questions such as, "Did you find the training relevant?" or "How would you rate the instructor's effectiveness?" A high level of positive feedback at this stage indicates that the participants engaged with the training, but it does not assess learning or behavior change.
2. Level 2: Learning
Definition: This level measures the increase in knowledge or skills that participants gained as a result of the training. It typically involves pre-and post-assessments, quizzes, or practical evaluations to assess participants’ understanding and retention of material.
Example: In the same customer service training, participants might take a quiz before the training and another one afterward. If the average score improves significantly from the pre- to post-test, it shows that learning occurred during the training session. For instance, if participants had an average score of 60% on the pre-test and 85% on the post-test, this indicates effective knowledge transfer.
3. Level 3: Behavior
Definition: This level evaluates the extent to which participants change their behavior and apply what they learned in the training within their work environment. This often requires observation over time to assess the transfer of skills to the job.
Example: After the training, a manager might observe staff in a call center to see if the employees are applying the customer service techniques they learned. If employees demonstrate improved communication skills and effective handling of customer complaints on the job, it suggests that the training was successful in fostering behavior change. Surveys or performance reviews comparing pre-training performance to post-training behavior can also provide insights.
4. Level 4: Results
Definition: This level measures the overall impact of the training program on organizational performance and objectives. It seeks to determine if the training led to measurable outcomes such as increased productivity, improved quality, reduced costs, or higher customer satisfaction.
Example: In the customer service training example, if the organization sees a 20% increase in customer satisfaction scores, a decrease in customer complaints, or a notable improvement in sales after the training, these outcomes can be attributed to the training. Metrics such as revenue growth, retention rates, and performance dashboards can provide data to demonstrate the program's overall effectiveness.
Conclusion
Kirkpatrick’s Model is instrumental for training and development practitioners in assessing various dimensions of training effectiveness. By starting with participant reaction, moving through learning and behavioral changes, and assessing ultimate results, organizations can develop a comprehensive understanding of how training investments contribute to business goals. Each level builds on the previous one, providing a holistic view of the training's impact.
1 answer