To determine which statement accurately describes the information in the graph, let's summarize the emissions for each country based on the provided data:
-
Denmark:
- 2009: 8 metric tons
- 2010: a little over 8 metric tons (which indicates an increase, but not a significant one)
-
Finland:
- 2009: 10 metric tons
- 2010: a little over 11 metric tons (indicating an increase)
-
Iceland:
- 2009: a little over 6 metric tons
- 2010: slightly less than that (indicating a decrease)
-
Norway:
- 2009: almost 10 metric tons
- 2010: nearly 12 metric tons (indicating an increase)
-
Sweden:
- 2009: almost 5 metric tons
- 2010: over 5 metric tons (indicating an increase)
Now let's analyze each statement:
-
Iceland produced more total carbon emissions than Denmark: This is false. Iceland's emissions in 2009 were a little over 6 metric tons, while Denmark's were 8 metric tons.
-
Norway produced twice as much carbon emissions as Finland: This is false. In 2009, Norway's emissions were almost 10 metric tons and Finland's were 10 metric tons. Even in 2010, Norway's emissions did not double that of Finland.
-
Sweden reduced carbon emissions the most: This is false. Sweden had an increase in emissions from almost 5 to over 5 metric tons, while Iceland saw a decrease.
-
All countries but Iceland had an increase in emissions: This statement is accurate. All countries listed (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden) had increases, while Iceland saw a decrease in emissions.
Therefore, the correct response is:
All countries but Iceland had an increase in emissions.