Laboratory Report: Titration of Ammonia in Dazzle Bleach
Aim
To determine the concentration of ammonia (NH₃) in a cleaning solution (Dazzle Bleach) through titration with hydrochloric acid (HCl) using various indicators, and to evaluate the effectiveness of each indicator based on their color change and appropriateness for the reaction.
Introduction
Titration is a quantitative chemical analysis method used to determine the concentration of a solute in a solution by reacting it with a standard solution. In this experiment, a strong acid (HCl) is used to titrate a weak base (NH₃). The reaction can be described as follows:
\[ \text{NH}_3(aq) + \text{HCl}(aq) \rightarrow \text{NH}_4^+(aq) + \text{Cl}^-(aq) \]
In this reaction, ammonia acts as a weak base and hydrochloric acid serves as the strong acid. The pH at the equivalence point will be lower than 7, reflective of the production of the conjugate acid, ammonium chloride (NH₄Cl) (Skoog et al., 2014; Harris, 2015).
Choosing the correct indicator is crucial due to the differences in the pH ranges over which they change color. Bromocresol green, methyl orange, and bromothymol blue were used in this experiment. Each indicator has a specific pH range for color change, which affects their suitability for detecting the endpoint of the titration (Bishop, 2017; Watanabe, 2018).
Materials
- Ammonia cleaning solution (Dazzle Bleach)
- 0.2 M Hydrochloric acid (HCl)
- Bromocresol green indicator
- Methyl orange indicator
- Bromothymol blue indicator
- 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks
- 5 mL pipette
- Burette
- Distilled water
- Beakers
- pH meter or pH strips for measurement
Results
Titration Results
-
Bromocresol Green
- Titrant 1: 7.30 mL
- Titrant 2: 5.90 mL
- Titrant 3: 5.90 mL
- Average Volume: 6.4 mL
- Molarity: 0.78125 M
- Mean Titre: 5.90 mL
- Overall Maximum Error: 1.40 mL
- % Error: 23.73%
- Concentration of NH₃: 0.3 M
- pH before titration: 11.3
- pH after 6.4 mL of HCl added: 5.5
-
Methyl Orange
- Titrant 1: 13.3 mL
- Titrant 2: 20.6 mL
- Titrant 3: 15.0 mL
- Average Volume: 16.3 mL
- Molarity: 0.1534 M
- Mean Titre: 14.15 mL
- Overall Maximum Error: 7.3 mL
- % Error: 50.34%
- Concentration of NH₃: 0.7 M
- pH before titration: 11.55
- pH after 6.4 mL of HCl added: 5.63
-
Bromothymol Blue
- No reaction observed.
Discussion
The results indicate a notable variation in the titre volumes reported for the different indicators. Methyl orange recorded a titre of 20.6 mL, which is the greatest among all the titrations. This could be attributed to its pH range, as it changes color between pH 3.1 to 4.4. If the endpoint of the titration exceeds this range, it may result in a higher volume of titrant being required (Harris, 2015).
For bromothymol blue, the lack of color change indicates that it was incapable of detecting the endpoint within the pH range expected for the neutralization of ammonia, which generally falls into a higher pH range than the change point for this indicator (Bishop, 2017).
Regarding the measurement errors, the overall maximum error was larger for methyl orange (7.3 mL) compared to bromocresol green (1.40 mL), suggesting greater inconsistency in titration with methyl orange likely due to its extended range of color change and subjective observations in the color transition (Skoog et al., 2014).
The titration using bromothymol blue proved ineffective, which is corroborated by the finding that its transition from yellow to blue occurs around a neutral pH of 6.0 to 7.6, which does not align well with the expected endpoint pH for the ammonia-HCl titration (Watanabe, 2018).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the most suitable indicator for the titration of ammonium in Dazzle Bleach was bromocresol green due to its appropriate color transition pH range that closely aligned with the pH endpoint of 5.5 for the reaction. Methyl orange was less effective due to its wide color change interval leading to significant errors in the reported titres, while bromothymol blue was the least suitable since no color change was observed throughout the titration.
Recommendations
To improve the accuracy and reliability of future titration experiments, the following measures are recommended:
- Conduct multiple trials to obtain a more reliable average for each indicator.
- Use a more precise method such as a pH meter for pH measurements instead of relying solely on color indicators.
- Train participants to recognize the endpoint more consistently to reduce subjective error linked to color perception.
References
- Bishop, L. (2017). Advanced Chemistry for GCSE. Cambridge University Press.
- Harris, D. C. (2015). Quantitative Chemical Analysis. W.H. Freeman and Company.
- Skoog, D. A., West, D. M., Holler, F. J., & Crouch, S. R. (2014). Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry. Cengage Learning.
- Watanabe, Y. (2018). Chemical Indicators: Selection and Use in Titrations. Journal of Chemical Education, 95 (2), 192–197.