Strict constructionists and loose constructionists disagree most on C. the allotment of federal and state powers.
Strict constructionists advocate for a narrow interpretation of the Constitution, emphasizing the powers explicitly stated or clearly implied within it, often leading to a limited role for the federal government. In contrast, loose constructionists favor a broader interpretation, allowing for a more expansive understanding of federal powers, which can lead to greater federal authority over state powers. This fundamental difference in interpreting the Constitution significantly affects discussions about the distribution of powers between federal and state governments.